2015년 12월 27일 일요일

The Fleet. Its Rivers, Prison, and Marriages 17

The Fleet. Its Rivers, Prison, and Marriages 17


This PANTHEON was a large circular building surmounted by a statue of
Fame. It was well warmed by a stove in its centre, and the grounds
were prettily laid out. There were the usual walks, flower-beds,
and pond, in the centre of which was a statue of Hercules, and, of
course, the usual out-of-door refreshment boxes, or arbours. But
it is just possible that it was owing to its somewhat disreputable
conduct that the landlord became bankrupt in 1774, and the Pantheon
was offered for sale. It was closed as a place of amusement in 1776,
and the famous Countess of Huntingdon had some idea of utilizing it
for the propagation of her peculiar religious views. However, the sum
necessary for alterations, proved too much for her ladyship, yet by
a strange mutation of fortune, somewhat akin to what we have seen in
our time, in the Grecian Theatre in the City Road, being taken by the
Salvation Army, the Pantheon was turned into a Proprietary Chapel,
called Northampton Chapel, which was served by clergymen of the Church
of England of strictly Evangelical principles, and it filled so well,
that the incumbent of the parish church asserted his right to preach
there whenever he liked, and also to nominate its chaplains. This the
proprietors did not quite see, and they closed the chapel. Then Lady
Huntingdon bought it, and, henceforth, it was called Spa Fields Chapel.
 
The illustration[53] is taken from the _New Spiritual Magazine_, and
I do not think that an uglier building could be produced. Probably
the statue of Fame was obliged to be removed, but the ventilator in
its place was certainly not an improvement. However, it is now pulled
down; but, before its demolition, it had to pass through the ordeal of
more proceedings at law. As long as the chapel was served by clergy,
nominally belonging to the Church of England, so long did the incumbent
of St. James's, Clerkenwell, assert his right to the patronage of it.
The Countess relied on her privilege as a peeress, to appoint her own
Chaplain, but this was overridden by competent legal opinion, and
nothing was left but for the officiating clergy to secede from the
Church of England, and take the oath of allegiance as Dissenting
Ministers. This the Countess did not relish; she would fain be in
the fold, and yet not of the fold, as do many others of this age, but
she had to eat the leek. She had the proud privilege of founding a
religious sect, and she left the bulk of her large property, after very
generous legacies, to the support of sixty-four chapels which she had
established throughout the kingdom. She died at her house in Spa Fields,
and was buried at Ashby-de-la-Zouch, in Leicestershire, "dressed in the
suit of white silk which she wore at the opening of a chapel in
Goodman's Fields."[54]
 
[Illustration: VIEW OF NORTHAMPTON OR SPA FIELDS CHAPEL, WITH THE
COUNTESS OF HUNTINGDON'S HOUSE ADJOINING.]
 
[Footnote 47: Conduit.]
 
[Footnote 48: This, I take it, refers to a practice mentioned
in a pamphlet, "A Step to the Bath" (London, 1700), which I
think is by Ned Ward. "The usual time being come to forsake
that fickle Element, _Half Tub Chairs_, Lin'd with Blankets,
Ply'd as thick as _Coaches_ at the _Play House_, or _Carts_ at
the _Custom House_." It has been suggested that the Chair was
used for debilitated patients; but, knowing the use of the
term "Chair" at that epoch, I venture to propose my solution.]
 
[Footnote 49: Such pleasure.]
 
[Footnote 50: Harl. MSS., 5961.]
 
[Footnote 51: Noorthouck (book i. p. 358) says, "It is to be
observed that in 1746, an hospital was founded by subscription
between London and Islington, for relieving poor people
afflicted with the smallpox, and for inoculation. This is said
to be the first foundation of the kind in Europe, and
consisted of three houses; one in Old Street for preparing
patients for inoculation; another in Islington" (Lower Street)
"when the disease appeared, and the third in Cold Bath fields
for patients in the natural way."]
 
[Footnote 52: See p. 89.]
 
[Footnote 53: See next page.]
 
[Footnote 54: _Gentleman's Magazine_, vol. lxi. (1791), p.
589. The Chapel was pulled down in January or February, 1887.]
 
 
[Illustration]
 
 
 
 
[Illustration]
 
 
 
 
CHAPTER XI.
 
 
It is almost impossible to write about anything connected with Spa
Fields, without mentioning the famous "Spa Fields Riots," which
occurred on Dec. 2, 1816. In every great city there will always be a
leaven of disquietude: demagogues who have nothing to lose, but all to
gain, will always find an audience for their outpourings; and, often,
the ignorant, and unthinking, have only to be told, by any knave, that
they are underpaid, downtrodden, or what not, and they are ready to
yell, with their sweet breaths, that they are. So was it then in 1816.
 
And it is also remarkable how history repeats itself; for, part of the
scheme proposed by the agitators on that day, was exactly similar to
the proposals of certain Irishmen and Socialists of our time--_teste_
the following handbill, taken from the _Times_, the newspaper of Dec.
7, 1816.
 
"SPENCE'S PLAN. For Parochial Partnerships in the Land, is
the only effectual Remedy for the Distresses and Oppression
of the People. The Landowners are not Proprietors in Chief;
they are but the _Stewards_ of the Public; For the LAND is the
PEOPLE'S FARM. The Expenses of the Government do not cause the
Misery that surrounds us, but the enormous exactions of these
'_Unjust Stewards_.' Landed Monopoly is indeed equally contrary
to the benign spirit of Christianity, and destructive of the
Independence and Morality of Mankind.
 
"'The Profit of the Earth is for all.'
 
"Yet how deplorably destitute are the great Mass of the People!
Nor is it possible for their situations to be radically
amended, but by the establishment of a system, founded on the
immutable basis of Nature and Justice. Experience demonstrates
its necessity and the rights of mankind require it for their
preservation.
 
"To obtain this important object, by extending the knowledge
of the above system, the Society of Spencean Philanthropists
has been instituted. Further information of it's principles
may be obtained by attending any of it's sectional meetings,
where subjects are discussed, calculated to enlighten the human
understanding, and where, also, the regulations of the society
may be procured, containing a Complete development of the
Spencean system. Every individual is admitted free of expense,
who will conduct himself with decorum.
 
First Section every Wednesday at the Cock, Grafton Street, Soho.
Second " " Thursday " Mulberry Tree, Mulberry Ct.,
Wilson Street, Moorfields.
Third " " Monday " Nag's Head, Carnaby Mrkt.
Fourth " " Tuesday " No. 8, Lumber St., Mint, Borough."
 
There! does not that read exactly like a modern speech delivered in
Trafalgar Square, Hyde Park, or Dublin? Of course it was the old story
of Demagogy. The pot boiled, the scum came to the top, and it boiled
over, so that, one fine day, there was a riot. It was a period of
distress for the working classes, who did not then, as now, swarm into
London from all parts of England, and expect Jupiter to help them; but
then, as now, the rich were ever willing to help their poorer brethren,
for, in the very same _Times_ newspaper that gives an account of this
Spa Fields Riot, there is a list of subscriptions towards the relief of
distress in Spitalfields alone, amounting to over £18,000.
 
The story is one that should be told, because it has its lesson and its
parallel in all time. The ruling spirit of the movement was Henry Hunt,
generally called Orator Hunt, a man fairly well to do, and who did not
agitate for the sake of his daily bread. The occasion of the meeting in
Spa Fields, at which some 10,000 people were present, was to receive
the answer of the Prince Regent to a petition from the distressed
mechanics of London and its vicinity for relief. It was held first
of all in front of the "Merlin's Cave" (a name which still survives
at 131, Rosomon Street, Clerkenwell), and afterwards in the adjacent
fields. The following account of the riots is from the _Times_ of Dec.
3, 1816:
 
"As a prelude to the scene that followed, and with the spirit
of the ruling demagogue, a person mounted a coal waggon with
three flags, on which were inscribed certain mottoes; and,
after having harangued a small audience, draughted off from the
general body, proceeded to the city, where the acts of violence
were perpetrated, which will be found in another part of our
paper.
 
"The speech of this orator, and the conduct of his audience, we
shall give in an extract from an evening paper as we were not
present at the first part of the drama ourselves.
 
"'In the field was a Coal waggon, upon which were mounted about
twenty persons, chiefly in the dress of sailors. Several flags
were displayed; two tricoloured ones, on one of which was the
following inscription:
 
"'Nature, Truth, and Justice! Feed the Hungry! Protect the
Oppressed! Punish Crimes!'
 
"'On a second tricoloured flag, no inscription.
 
"'On a third white flag was inscribed in red letters the
following:
 
"'The brave Soldiers are our Brothers; treat them kindly.'
 
"'Many had bludgeons, and others pockets full of stones. One
person in the waggon then addressed the meeting in the following
strain:--"I am sorry to tell you that our application to the
Prince has failed. He, the father of his people, answered--'My
family have never attended to Petitions but from Oxford and
Cambridge, and the City of London.' And is this Man the father
of the people? No. Has he listened to your petition? No. The day
is come--(_It is, It is_, from the mob.) We must do more than
words. We have been oppressed for 800 years since the Norman
Conquest. If they would give ye a hod, a shovel, a spade, and a
hoe, your mother earth would supply you. (_Aye, aye, she would._
Loud Applause.) Country men, if you will have your wrongs
redressed, follow me. (_That we will._ Shouts.) Wat Tyler would
have succeeded had he not been basely murdered by a Lord Mayor,
William of Walworth. Has the Parliament done their duty? No.
Has the Regent done his duty? No, no. A man who receives one
million a year public money gives only £5,000 to the poor. They
have neglected the starving people, robbed them of everything,
and given them a penny. Is this to be endured? Four millions
are in distress; our brothers in Ireland are in a worse state,
the climax of misery is complete, it can go no farther. The
Ministers have not granted our rights. Shall we take them?
(_Yes, yes_, from the mob.) Will you demand them? (_Yes, yes._)
If I jump down will you follow me? (_Yes, yes_, was again vociferated.)."

댓글 없음: