2015년 2월 24일 화요일

Clergymen and Doctors 4

Clergymen and Doctors 4



 "MONMOUTH."
 
 
SOUTH ON THE COMMONWEALTH PREACHERS.
 
Dr. South, in one of his sermons, thus reflected on the untrained and
fanatical preachers of the time of the Commonwealth--many of whom but
too well deserved the strictures:--"It may not be amiss to take
occasion to utter a great truth, as both worthy to be now considered,
and never to be forgot,--namely, that if we reflect upon the late times
of confusion which passed upon the ministry, we shall find that the
grand design of the fanatic crew was to persuade the world that a
standing settled ministry was wholly useless. This, I say, was the main
point which they then drove at. And the great engine to effect this was
by engaging men of several callings (and those the meaner still the
better) to hold forth and harangue the multitude, sometimes in the
streets, sometimes in churches, sometimes in barns, and sometimes from
pulpits, and sometimes from tubs, and, in a word, wheresoever and
howsoever they could clock the senseless and unthinking babble about
them. And with this practice well followed, they (and their friends the
Jesuits) concluded, that in some time it would be no hard matter to
persuade the people, that if men of other professions were able to
teach and preach the word, then to what purpose should there be a
company of men brought up to it and maintained in it at the charge of a
public allowance? especially when at the same time the truly godly so
greedily gaped and grasped at it for their self-denying selves. So that
preaching, we see, was their prime engine. But now what was it, which
encouraged those men to set up for a work, which (if duly managed) was
so difficult in itself, and which they were never bred to? Why, no
doubt it was, that low, cheap, illiterate way, then commonly used, and
cried up for the only gospel soul-searching way (as the word then
went), and which the craftier set of them saw well enough, that with a
little exercise and much confidence, they might in a short time come to
equal, if not exceed; as it cannot be denied, but that some few of them
(with the help of a few friends in masquerade) accordingly did. But, on
the contrary, had preaching been made and reckoned a matter of solid
and true learning, of theological knowledge and long and severe study
(as the nature of it required it to be), assuredly no preaching cobbler
amongst them all would ever have ventured so far beyond his last, as to
undertake it. And consequently this their most powerful engine for
supplanting the church and clergy had never been attempted, nor perhaps
so much as thought on; and therefore of most singular benefit, no
question, would it be to the public, if those who have authority to
second their advice, would counsel the ignorant and the forward to
consider what divinity is, and what they themselves are, and so to put
up their preaching tools, their Medulla's note-books, their
melleficiums, concordances, and all, and betake themselves to some
useful trade, which nature had most particularly fitted them for."
 
 
PETER THE GREAT AS DENTIST.
 
The Czar Peter, impelled by natural curiosity and love of science, was
very fond of witnessing dissections and operations. He first made these
known in Russia, and gave orders to be informed when anything of the
kind was going on at the hospitals, that he might, if possible, be
present to gratify his love for such spectacles. He frequently aided
the operator, and was able to dissect properly, to bleed, draw teeth,
and perform other operations as well as one of the faculty. Along with
a case of mathematical instruments, he always carried about with him a
pouch furnished with surgical instruments. The wife of one of his
valets had once a disagreeable experience of his skill. She was
suspected of gallantry, and her husband vowed revenge. He sat in the
ante-chamber with a sad and pensive face, provoking the Czar to inquire
the occasion of his gloom. The valet said that nothing was wrong,
except that his wife refused to have a tooth drawn that caused her
great pain. The Czar desired that he should be allowed to cure her, and
was at once taken to her apartment, where he made her sit down that he
might examine her mouth, in spite of her earnest protestations that she
had no toothache. The husband, however, alleging that she always said
so when the physician was present, and renewed her lamentations when he
departed, the Czar ordered him to hold her head and arms; and, pulling
forth his instruments, promptly extracted the tooth which he supposed
to be the cause of the pain, disregarding the piteous cries of the
persecuted lady. But in a few days the Czar learned that the whole
affair was a trick of the valet to torment his wife; and his Majesty
thereupon, as his manner was, administered to him a very severe
chastisement with his own hands.
 
 
A MILD CRITICISM.
 
While Sir Busick Harwood was Professor of Anatomy at Cambridge, he was
called in, in a case of some difficulty, by the friends of a patient,
who were anxious for his opinion of the malady. Being told the name of
the medical man who had previously prescribed, Sir Busick exclaimed,
"He! if he were to descend into the patient's stomach with a candle and
lantern, when he ascended he would not be able to name the complaint!"
 
 
HOUR-GLASSES IN CHURCH.
 
To restrain over-eloquent or over-zealous preachers in the length of
their discourses, hour-glasses were introduced in churches about the
period of the Reformation. In the frontispiece prefixed to the Bible of
the Bishops' Translation, printed in 1569, Archbishop Parker is
represented with an hour-glass standing on his right hand. Clocks and
watches being then but rarely in use, the hour-glass was had recourse
to as the only convenient public remembrancer which the state of the
arts could then supply. The practice of using them became generally
prevalent, and continued till the period of the Revolution. The
hour-glass was placed either on the side of the pulpit, or on a stand
in front. "One whole houre-glasse," "one halfe houre-glasse," occur in
an inventory taken about 1632 of the properties of the church of All
Saints at Newcastle-on-Tyne. Daniel Burgess, a Nonconformist preacher
at the commencement of last century, alike famous for the length of his
pulpit harangues and the quaintness of his illustrations, was once
vehemently declaiming against the sin of drunkenness. Having exhausted
the customary time, he turned the hour-glass, and said, "Brethren, I
have somewhat more to say on the nature and consequences of
drunkenness; so let's have _the other glass and then_--" The jest,
however, seems to have been borrowed from the frontispiece of a small
book, entitled _England's Shame, or a Relation of the Life and Death of
Hugh Peters_, published in 1663; where Peters is represented preaching,
and holding an hour-glass in his left hand, in the act of saying, "I
know you are good fellows; so let's have another glass."
 
 
THE METHODIST DOG.
 
In the early days of Methodism, meetings for preaching and prayer were
held regularly about Bristol, and usually well attended. The people who
had frequented these meetings had repeatedly observed a dog that came
from a distance; and as at the house to which he belonged the
Methodists were not respected, he always came alone. At that time, the
preaching on Sunday began immediately after the church service ended;
and this singular animal, invariably attending on those occasions,
received the name of the "Methodist Dog." He was generally met by the
congregation returning from the church, and abused and pelted by the
boys belonging to that party. His regular attendance had often been the
subject of public debate; and, merely to prove the sagacity of the
animal, the meeting, for one evening, was removed to another house.
Surprising as it may seem, at the proper and exact time he made his
appearance. A few weeks after, his owner returning intoxicated from
Leeds market, was drowned in a narrow shallow stream; and from that day
the "Methodist Dog" ceased to attend the preaching. Concerning this odd
fact, a good Methodist (John Nelson) used to say, "The frequent
attendance of this dog at the meeting was designed to attract his
master's curiosity, and engage him thereby to visit the place; where,
hearing the gospel, he might have been enlightened, converted, and
eternally saved. But the end to be answered being frustrated by the
master's death, the means to secure it were no longer needful on the
dog's part."
 
 
THE TWO GATES OF HEAVEN.
 
"God," says St. Pierre, in his _Harmonies of Nature_, "God has placed
upon earth two gates that lead to heaven; He has set them at the two
extremities of life--one at the entrance, the other at the issue. The
first is that of innocence; the second, that of repentance."
 
 
GIBBON'S RETORT ON THE PHYSICIAN.
 
A good story of Gibbon the historian is told in Moore's Memoirs. Gibbon
and an eminent French physician were rivals in courting the favour of
Lady Elizabeth Foster. Impatient at Gibbon's occupying so much of her
attention by his conversation, the doctor said crossly to him, "_Quand
milady Elizabeth Foster sera malade de vos fadaises, je la guérirai_."
[When my Lady Elizabeth Foster is made ill by your twaddle, I will cure
her.] On which Gibbon, drawing himself up grandly, and looking
disdainfully at the physician, replied, "_Quand milady Elizabeth Foster
sera morte de vos recettes, je l'immortaliserai_." [When my Lady
Elizabeth Foster is dead from your prescriptions, I will immortalize
her.]
 
 
TRUMP CARDS.
 
Mrs. Bray relates the following instance of the power of a ruling
passion or habit, concerning a Devonshire physician, boasting the not
untradesmanlike name of Vial, who was a desperate lover of whist. One
evening, in the midst of a deal, the doctor fell off his chair in a
fit. Consternation seized on the company, who knew not whether he was
alive or dead. At length he showed signs of returning life; and,
retaining the last fond idea that had possessed him at the moment he
fell into the fit, he exclaimed, "_What is trumps?_" A _bon-vivant_,
brought to his deathbed by an immoderate use of wine, after having been
told that he could not in all human probability survive many hours, and
would die before eight o'clock next morning, summoned the small
remnants of his strength to call the doctor back, and said, with the
true recklessness of a gambler, "Doctor, I'll bet you a bottle that I
live till nine!"
 
 
PERSUASIVENESS OF WHITFIELD.
 
Benjamin Franklin, in his memoirs, bears witness to the extraordinary
effect that was produced by Whitfield's preaching in America, and tells
an anecdote equally characteristic of the preacher and of himself. "I
happened," says Franklin, "to attend one of his sermons, in the course
of which I perceived that he intended to finish with a collection, and
I silently resolved he should get nothing from me. I had in my pocket a
handful of copper money, three or four silver dollars, and five
pistoles in gold. As he proceeded, I began to soften, and concluded to
give the copper. Another stroke of his oratory made me ashamed of that,
and determined me to give the silver; and he finished so admirably,
that I emptied my pocket wholly into the collector's dish, gold and
all. At this sermon there was also one of our club, who, being of my
sentiments regarding the building in Georgia (the subject of
Whitfield's appeal), and suspecting a collection might be intended, had
by precaution emptied his pockets before he came from home. Towards the
conclusion of the discourse, however, he felt a strong inclination to
give, and applied to a neighbour who stood near him to lend him some
money for the purpose. The request was fortunately made to perhaps the
only man in the company who had the firmness not to be affected by the
preacher. His answer was: 'At any other time, friend Hodgkinson, I
would lend to thee freely; but not now, for thee seems to be out of thy
right senses.'"
 
 
"PREACHING FOR A CROWN."
 
Howell Davies, who was Whitfield's Welsh coadjutor, walking one Sunday
morning to preach, was accosted by a clergyman on horseback, who was
bound on the same errand, and who complained of the unprofitable
drudgery of his profession, saying that he could never get more than
half-a-guinea for preaching. The Welshman replied that he for his part
was content to preach _for a crown_. This so offended the mounted
priest, that he upbraided the pedestrian for disgracing his cloth.
"Perhaps," said Davies, "you will hold me still cheaper when I inform
you that I am going nine miles to preach, and have only seven-pence in
my pocket to bear my expenses out and in. But the crown for which I
preach is a crown of glory."
 
 
SHEDDING HIS BLOOD FOR HIS COUNTRY.
 
Lord Radnor, who lived in the middle of last century, had a singular
liking for the amateur employment of the lancet on the veins of his
friends, or of persons whom he induced by gifts of money to allow him
to display his skill upon them. It is told of Lord Chesterfield, that,
desiring the vote of Lord Radnor in some division impending in the
House of Lords, he went to him, and by and by, in the course of
indifferent conversation, complained that he was suffering from a bad
headache. Lord Radnor leaped at the opportunity of indulging his
predilection for phlebotomy on such a _corpus nobile_; he told Lord
Chesterfield that he ought to lose blood at once. "Do you indeed think
so, my dear Lord? Then do me the favour to add to the service of your
advice that of your skill. I know that you are a clever surgeon." In a
moment Lord Radnor had pulled out his lancet case, and opened a vein in
his visitor's arm; who subsequently, when the bandage was being put on,
as if casually, asked the operator, "By the by, does your Lordship go
down to the House to-day?" Lord Radnor answered that he had not
intended going, not having information enough as to the question that
was to be debated; "But on what side will you, that have considered the
matter, vote?" Lord Chesterfield stated his views to his amateur
surgeon, whose vanity he had so cleverly flattered; and left the house
with the promise of Lord Radnor's vote--having literally, as he told an
intensely amused party of his friends the same evening, "shed his blood
for the good of his country."
 
 
DR. KIRWAN, DEAN OF KILLALA.
 
Towards the end of last century, there arose in Ireland an eminent
preacher, who, to use the emphatic language of Grattan, "broke through
the slumbers of the pulpit." This was Walter Blake Kirwan, originally a
Catholic priest and Professor of Philosophy at Louvain, and afterwards
chaplain to the Neapolitan embassy at London. In 1787 he resolved to
conform to the Establishment, and preached for the first time to a
Protestant congregation in St. Peter's Church at Dublin. He
subsequently became Prebend of Howth, Rector of St. Nicholas, Dublin,
and ultimately Dean of Killala. Wonders have been recorded of his
attractiveness as a preacher. That he was a great orator, the manner in
which he was attended abundantly proved. People crowded to hear him,
who on no other occasion appeared within the walls of a church: men of
the world, who had other pursuits, men of professions, physicians,
lawyers, actors--in short, all to whom clergymen of the highest order
had any charms. The pressure of the crowds was immense; guards were
obliged to be stationed, and even palisades erected, to keep off from
the largest churches the overflowing curiosity, which could not
contribute adequately to the great charities for which he generally
preached. The sums collected on these occasions exceeded anything ever
before known. In one instance, such was the magical impression he
produced, that many persons, ladies particularly, after contributing
all the money they had about them, threw their watches, rings, and
other valuable ornaments into the plate, and next day redeemed them
with money. The produce of this triumph of pulpit oratory was indeed
magnificent; it was no less than £1200--a much larger sum at that day
than the figures represent in ours. Worn out by his labours, Dr. Kirwan
died in 1805; and a book of sermons printed in 1814 is his sole
literary memorial.
 
 
JEREMY TAYLOR.
 
Jeremy Taylor, Bishop of Down, from the fertility of his mind and the
extent of his imagination, has been styled "the Shakespeare of English
divines." His sermons abound with some of the most brilliant passages;
and embrace such a variety of matter, and such a mass of knowledge and
of learning, that even the acute Bishop Warburton said of him: "I can
fathom the understandings of most men, yet I am not certain that I can
fathom the understanding of Jeremy Taylor." His comparison between a
married and a single life, in his sermon on the Blessedness of
Marriage, is rich in tender sentiments and exquisitely elegant imagery.
"Marriage," says the Bishop, "is the mother of the world, and preserves
kingdoms, and fills cities, churches, and even heaven itself. Celibacy,
like the fly in the heart of an apple, dwells in a perpetual sweetness;
yet sits alone, and is confined, and dies in singularity. But marriage,
like the useful bee, builds a house, and gathers sweetness from every
flower, and labours and unites into societies and republics, and sends
out colonies, and fills the world with delicacies, and obeys the king,
keeps order, and exercises many virtues, and promotes the interest of
mankind; and is that state of things to which God hath designed the
present constitution of the world. Marriage hath in it the labour of
love, and the delicacies of friendship; the blessings of society, and
the union of hands and hearts. It hath in it less of beauty, but more
of safety, than a single life; it is more merry and more sad; is fuller
of joy and fuller of sorrow; it lies under more burthens, but is
supported by the strength of love and charity; and these burthens are
delightful."
 
 
A TWO-EDGED ACCUSATION.
 
Dr. Freind, like too many of the physicians of his time--under Queen
Anne--was not very careful to keep his head clear and hand steady by
moderation in tavern potations; and more often than not he was tipsy
when he visited his patients. Once he entered the chamber of a lady of
high rank in such a state of intoxicated confusion, that he could do
nothing more than mutter to himself, "Drunk--drunk--drunk, by ----!"
Happily, or unhappily, the lady, from the same cause, was not in any
better case than the physician; and when she came to herself, she was
informed by her maid that the doctor had briefly and gruffly described
_her_ condition, and then abruptly taken his leave. Freind next day was
puzzling as to the apology he should offer to his patient for his
unfitness to deal with her ailment, when to his great joy there came a
note from the lady, enclosing a handsome fee, and entreating him to
keep his own counsel as to what he had seen.
 
 
RADCLIFFE AND KNELLER.
 
Sir Godfrey Kneller and Dr. Radcliffe lived next door to each other in
Bow Street, just after the latter had come up to town, and were
extremely intimate. Kneller had a very fine garden, and as the doctor
was fond of flowers, he permitted him to have a door into it.
Radcliffe's servants, however, gathering and destroying the flowers,
Kneller sent to inform him that he would nail up the door; to which
Radcliffe, in his rough manner, replied, "Tell him he may do anything
but paint it."--"Well," retorted Kneller, "he may say what he will; for
tell him, I will take anything from him, except physic."
 
 
SLAPS FOR SLEEPERS IN CHURCH.
 
A Methodist preacher once, observing that several of his congregation
had fallen asleep, exclaimed with a loud voice, "A fire! a fire!"
"Where? where?" cried his auditors, whom the alarm had thoroughly
aroused from their slumbers. "In the place of judgment," said the
preacher, "for those who sleep under the ministry of the holy gospel."
Another preacher, of a different persuasion, more remarkable for drowsy
hearers, finding himself in a like unpleasant situation with his
auditory, or rather _dormitory_, suddenly stopped in his discourse,
and, addressing himself in a whispering tone to a number of noisy
children in the gallery, said, "Silence! silence! children; if you keep
up such a noise, you will waken all the old folks below." Dr. South,
chaplain of Charles II., once when preaching before the Court--then
composed, as every one knows, of the most profligate and dissolute men
in the nation--saw, in the middle of his discourse, that sleep had
gradually made a conquest of his hearers. He immediately stopped short,
and, changing his tone, called out to Lord Lauderdale three times. His
Lordship standing up, Dr. South said, with great composure, "My Lord, I
am sorry to interrupt your repose; but I must beg of you that you will
not snore quite so loud, lest you awaken his Majesty."
 
Lassenius, chaplain to the Danish Court in the end of the seventeenth
century, for a long time, to his vexation, had seen that during his
sermon the greater part of the congregation fell asleep. One day he
suddenly stopped, and, pulling shuttlecock and battledore from his
pocket, began to play with them in the pulpit. This odd behaviour
naturally attracted the attention of the hearers who were still awake;
they jogged the sleepers, and in a very short time everybody was
lively, and looking to the pulpit with the greatest astonishment. Then
Lassenius began a very severe castigatory discourse, saying, "When I
announce to you sacred and important truths, you are not ashamed to go
to sleep; but when I play the fool, you are all eye and ear."
 
When Fenelon, as almoner, attended Louis XIV. to a sermon preached by a
Capuchin, he fell asleep. The Capuchin perceived it, and breaking off
his discourse, cried out, "Awake that sleeping Abbé, who comes here
only to pay his court to the King;" a reproof which Fenelon himself
often related with pleasure after he became Archbishop of Cambray.
 
A PREscRIPTION FOR LONG LIFE.
 
In the reign of Francis I. of France, the saying went--
 
"_Lever à cinq, diner à neuf, Souper à cinq, coucher à neuf, Fait vivre
d'ans nonante et neuf_;"
 
which we thus translate--
 
"Rising at five, and dining at nine, Supping at five, and bedding at nine, Brings the years of a man to ninety and nine."

댓글 없음: