2015년 10월 25일 일요일

The Battle of the Falkland Islands 24

The Battle of the Falkland Islands 24



LIEUTENANT-COMMANDER W. J. O'NEIL and LIEUTENANT P. A. MURCHIE,
of the Royal Naval Reserve, together with CHIEF-ENGINEER F.
DRUMMOND and 2ND ENGINEER J. MCDONALD, were all specially
mentioned in dispatches.
 
In addition to the above, twelve men were awarded the D.S.M. for
various acts of gallantry.
 
 
 
 
II
 
DISPATCH OF THE ACTION FOUGHT OFF CORONEL
 
November 1st, 1914
 
THE NAVAL FIGHT OFF CHILE
 
 
The Secretary of the Admiralty announces that the following report
has been received from H.M.S. _Glasgow_ (Captain John Luce, R.N.)
concerning the recent action off the Chilean coast:--
 
_Glasgow_ left Coronel 9 A.M. on November 1 to rejoin _Good Hope_
(flagship), _Monmouth_, and _Otranto_ at rendezvous. At 2 P.M.
flagship signalled that apparently from wireless calls there
was an enemy ship to northward. Orders were given for squadron
to spread N.E. by E. in the following order: _Good Hope_,
_Monmouth_, _Otranto_, and _Glasgow_, speed to be worked up to 15
knots. 4.20 P.M. saw smoke; proved to be enemy ships, one small
cruiser and two armoured cruisers. _Glasgow_ reported to Admiral,
ships in sight were warned, and all concentrated on _Good Hope_.
At 5 P.M. _Good Hope_ was sighted.
 
5.47 P.M., squadron formed in line-ahead in following order:
_Good Hope_, _Monmouth_, _Glasgow_, _Otranto_. Enemy, who had
turned south, were now in single line-ahead 12 miles off,
_Scharnhorst_ and _Gneisenau_ leading. 6.18 P.M., speed ordered
to 17 knots, and flagship signalled _Canopus_, 'I am going
to attack enemy now.' Enemy were now 15,000 yards away and
maintained this range, at the same time jambing wireless signals.
 
By this time sun was setting immediately behind us from enemy
position, and while it remained above horizon we had advantage in
light, but range too great. 6.55 P.M., sun set, and visibility
conditions altered, our ships being silhouetted against
afterglow, and failing light made enemy difficult to see.
 
7.3 P.M., enemy opened fire 12,000 yards, followed in quick
succession by _Good Hope_, _Monmouth_, _Glasgow_. Two squadrons
were now converging, and each ship engaged opposite number in
the line. Growing darkness and heavy spray of head sea made
firing difficult, particularly for main deck guns of _Good Hope_
and _Monmouth_. Enemy firing salvo got range quickly, and their
third salvo caused fire to break out on fore part of both ships,
which were constantly on fire till 7.45 P.M. 7.50 P.M., immense
explosion occurred on _Good Hope_ amidships, flames reaching 200
feet high. Total destruction must have followed. It was now quite
dark.
 
Both sides continued firing at flashes of opposing guns.
_Monmouth_ was badly down by the bow and turned away to get
stern to sea, signalling to _Glasgow_ to that effect. 8.30 P.M.,
_Glasgow_ signalled to _Monmouth_, 'Enemy following us,' but
received no reply. Under rising moon enemy's ships were now
seen approaching, and as _Glasgow_ could render _Monmouth_ no
assistance, she proceeded at full speed to avoid destruction.
8.50 P.M., lost sight of enemy. 9.20 P.M., observed 75 flashes of
fire, which was no doubt final attack on _Monmouth_.
 
Nothing could have been more admirable than conduct of officers
and men throughout. Though it was most trying to receive great
volume of fire without chance of returning it adequately, all
kept perfectly cool, there was no wild firing, and discipline
was the same as at battle practice. When target ceased to be
visible, gunlayers spontaneously ceased fire. The serious reverse
sustained has entirely failed to impair the spirit of officers
and ship's company, and it is our unanimous wish to meet the
enemy again as soon as possible.
 
 
 
 
III
 
OFFICIAL DISPATCH OF VICE-ADMIRAL COUNT VON SPEE
 
 
The following official report of the action fought off Coronel on
November 1st appeared in the German Press, and is interesting in the
light of being an accurate account as viewed by our enemies.
 
On comparing it with Captain Luce's account, it will be seen that
the German clocks were about thirty minutes slow on our time. Other
evidence also points to this conclusion:--
 
The squadron under my command, composed of the large cruisers
_Scharnhorst_ and _Gneisenau_, and the small cruisers _Nürnberg_,
_Leipzig_, and _Dresden_, reached on November 1st a point about
twenty sea miles from the Chilean coast, in order to attack a
British cruiser which, according to trustworthy information, had
reached the locality on the previous evening. On the way to the
spot the small cruisers were several times thrown out on the
flanks to observe steamers and sailing ships.
 
At 4.15 P.M. the _Nürnberg_, which was detached on one of
these missions, was lost sight of to the north-east, while the
_Dresden_ remained about twelve sea miles behind. With the bulk
of the fleet, I was about forty miles north of Arauco Bay. At
4.17 P.M. there were sighted to the south-west at first two
ships, and then at 4.25 P.M. a third ship about fifteen miles
away. Two of them were identified as warships, and were presumed
to be the _Monmouth_ and _Glasgow_, while the third was evidently
the auxiliary cruiser _Otranto_. They, too, seemed to be on a
southerly course. The squadron steamed at full speed in pursuit,
keeping the enemy four points to the starboard. The wind was
south, force 6, with a correspondingly high sea, so that I had to
be careful not to be manœuvred into a lee position. Moreover, the
course chosen helped to cut off the enemy from the neutral coast.
 
About 4.35 P.M. it was seen that the enemy ships were steering
to the west, and I gradually changed my course south-west, the
_Scharnhorst_ working up 22 knots, while the _Gneisenau_ and the
_Leipzig_ slowed down. The enemy's numerous wireless messages
were 'jammed' as far as possible.
 
At 5.20 the arrival of another warship was reported which took
the head of the line, and was identified as the _Good Hope_, the
flagship of Rear-Admiral Cradock.
 
The enemy ships now got into battle formation, hoisted their
mast-head flags, and tried slowly to approach a southerly course.
From 5.35 P.M. onwards I held to a south-westerly course, and
later to southerly course, and reduced speed to enable my own
ships to come up. At 6.7 both lines--except _Dresden_, which
was about one mile astern, and the _Nürnberg_, which was at a
considerable distance--were on an almost parallel southerly
course, the distance separating them being 135 hectometres
(14,760 yards).
 
At 6.20, when at a distance of 124 hectometres, I altered my
course one point towards the enemy, and at 6.34 opened fire at
a range of 104 hectometres. There was a head wind and sea, and
the ships rolled and pitched heavily, particularly the small
cruisers, on both sides.
 
Observation and range-finding work was most difficult, the seas
sweeping over the forecastles and conning-towers, and preventing
the use of some guns on the middle decks, the crews of which
were never able to see the sterns of their opponents, and only
occasionally their bows. On the other hand, the guns of the two
armoured cruisers worked splendidly, and were well served.
 
At 6.39 the first hit was recorded in the _Good Hope_. Shortly
afterwards the British opened fire. I am of opinion that they
suffered more from the heavy seas than we did. Both their
armoured cruisers, with the shortening range and the failing
light, were practically covered by our fire, while they
themselves, so far as can be ascertained at present, only hit the
_Scharnhorst_ twice and the _Gneisenau_ four times. At 6.53, when
at a distance of 60 hectometres, I sheered off a point.
 
The enemy's artillery at this time was firing more slowly, while
we were able to observe numerous hits. Among other things, it
was seen that the roof of the fore double turret was carried
away, and that a fierce fire was started in the turret. The
_Scharnhorst_ reckons thirty-five hits on the _Good Hope_.
 
As the distance, in spite of our change of course, had now

댓글 없음: