2015년 7월 20일 월요일

The Provinces of the Roman Empire 44

The Provinces of the Roman Empire 44



The states of Massinissa, of Bocchus, of Bogud, as also
the Carthaginian, proceeded from the northern verge, and all the
civilisation of North Africa is based pre-eminently on this coast;
but, so far as we can discern, they all regarded the tribes settled
or roving in the south as subjects, and, if they withdrew themselves
from subjection, as insurgents, so far as the distance and the desert
did not by doing away with contact do away with control. Neighbouring
states, with which relations of right or of treaty might have
subsisted, can hardly be pointed out in the south of northern Africa,
or where such a one appears, such as, in particular, the kingdom of the
Garamantes, its position is not to be strictly distinguished from that
of the hereditary principalities within the civilised territory. This
was the case also as regards Roman Africa; as for the previous rulers,
so also doubtless for Roman civilisation there was to be found a limit
to the south, but hardly so for the Roman territorial supremacy. There
is never mention of any formal extension or taking back of the frontier
in Africa; the insurrections in the Roman territory, and the inroads
of the neighbouring peoples, look here all the more similar to each
other, as even in the regions undoubtedly in Roman possession, still
more than in Syria or Spain, many a remote and impassable district knew
nothing of Roman taxation and of Roman recruiting. For that reason it
seems appropriate to connect with the view of the several provinces
at the same time the slight information which has been left to us in
historical tradition, or by means of preserved monuments, respecting
the friendly or hostile relations of the Romans with their southern
neighbours.
 
[Sidenote: Province of Africa and Numidia.]
 
The former territory of Carthage and the larger part of the earlier
kingdom of Numidia, united with it by the dictator Caesar, or, as they
also called it, the old and the new Africa, formed until the end of the
reign of Tiberius the province of that name, which extended from the
boundary of Cyrene to the river Ampsaga, embracing the modern state
of Tripoli as well as Tunis and the French province of Constantine
(iv. 470 f.) {iv. 447.}. The government, however, for this territory,
which was considerable, and required an extended frontier-defence,
reverted under the emperor Gaius in the main to the twofold division
of the republican times, and committed the portion of the province
that did not stand in need of special border-defence to the civil
government, and the rest of the territory furnished with garrisons to
a military commandant not further amenable to its authority. The cause
of this was, that Africa in the partition of the provinces between
emperor and senate was given to the latter, and, as from the state
of things there a command on a larger scale could not be dispensed
with, the co-ordination of the governor delegated by the senate and
of the military commandant nominated by the emperor--which latter
according to the subsisting hierarchy was placed under the orders of
the former--could not but provoke and did provoke collisions between
these officials and even between emperor and senate. To this an end was
put in the year 37 by an arrangement that the coast-land from Hippo
(Bonah), as far as the borders of Cyrene, should retain the old name
of Africa and should remain with the proconsul, whereas the western
part of the province with the capital Cirta (Constantine), as well
as the interior with the great military camps to the north of the
Aures, and generally all territory furnished with garrisons, should
be placed under the commandant of the African legion. This commandant
had senatorial rank, but belonged not to the consular, but to the
praetorial class.
 
[Sidenote: The two Mauretanian kingdoms.]
 
The western half of North Africa was divided at the time of the
dictator Caesar (iv. 461) {iv. 438.} into the two kingdoms of Tingi
(Tangier), at that time under king Bogud and of Iol, the later
Caesarea (Zershell), at that time under king Bocchus. As both kings
had as decidedly taken the side of Caesar in the struggle against
the republicans as king Juba of Numidia had taken the side of the
opposite party, and as they had rendered most essential services to
him during the African and the Spanish wars, not merely were both left
in possession of their rule, but the domain of Bocchus, and probably
also that of Bogud, was enlarged by the victor.[278] Then, when the
rivalries between Antonius and Caesar the younger began, king Bogud
alone in the west placed himself on the side of Antonius, and on the
instigation of his brother and of his wife invaded Spain during the
Perusine war (714) {40 B.C.}; but his neighbour Bocchus and his own
capital Tingis took part for Caesar and against him. At the conclusion
of peace Antonius allowed Bogud to fall, and Caesar gave the rest of
his territory to king Bocchus, but gave Roman municipal rights to the
town of Tingis. When, some years later, a rupture took place between
the two rulers, the ex-king took part energetically in the struggle in
the hope of regaining his kingdom on this occasion, but at the capture
of the Messenian town Methone he was taken prisoner by Agrippa and
executed.
 
[Sidenote: Juba II.]
 
Already some years before (721) {33 B.C.} king Bocchus had died;
his kingdom, the whole of western Africa, was soon afterwards (729)
{25 B.C.} obtained by the son of the last Numidian king, Juba II.,
the husband of Cleopatra, the daughter of Antonius by the Egyptian
queen.[279] Both had been exhibited to the Roman public in early youth
as captive kings’ children, Juba in the triumphal procession of Caesar
the father, Cleopatra in that of the son; it was a wonderful juncture
that they now were sent away from Rome as king and queen of the most
esteemed vassal-state of the empire, but it was in keeping with the
circumstances. Both were brought up in the imperial family; Cleopatra
was treated by the legitimate wife of her father with motherly kindness
like her own children; Juba had served in Caesar’s army. The youth of
the dependent princely houses, which was numerously represented at the
imperial court and played a considerable part in the circle around
the imperial princes, was generally employed in the early imperial
period for the filling up of the vassal principalities, after a similar
manner, according to free selection, as the first class in rank of the
senate was employed for the filling up of the governorships of Syria
and Germany. For almost fifty years (729-775 U.C., 25 B.C-A.D. 23) he,
and after him his son Ptolemaeus, bore rule over western Africa; it is
true that, like the town Tingis from his predecessor, a considerable
number of the most important townships, particularly on the coast, was
withdrawn from him by the bestowal of Roman municipal rights, and,
apart from the capital, these kings of Mauretania were almost nothing
but princes of the Berber tribes.
 
[Sidenote: Erection of the provinces of Caesarea and Tingi.]
 
This government lasted up to the year 40, when it appeared fitting to
the emperor Gaius, chiefly on account of the rich treasure, to call
his cousin to Rome, to deliver him there to the executioner, and to
take the territory into imperial administration. Both rulers were
unwarlike, the father a Greek man of letters after the fashion of this
period, compiling so-called memorabilia of a historical or geographical
kind, or relative to the history of art, in endless books, noteworthy
by his--we might say--international literary activity, well read in
Phoenician and Syrian literature, but exerting himself above all to
diffuse the knowledge of Roman habits and of so-called Roman history
among the Hellenes, moreover, a zealous friend of art and frequenter
of the theatre; the son a prince of the common type, passing his time
in court-life and princely luxury. Among their subjects they were
held of little account, whether as regards their personality or as
vassals of the Romans; against the Gaetulians in the south king Juba
had on several occasions to invoke the help of the Roman governor,
and, when in Roman Africa the prince of the Numidians, Tacfarinas,
revolted against the Romans, the Moors flocked in troops to his banner.
Nevertheless the end of the dynasty and the introduction of Roman
provincial government into the land made a deep impression. The Moors
were faithfully devoted to their royal house; altars were still erected
under the Roman rule in Africa to the kings of the race of Massinissa
(p. 305). Ptolemaeus, whatever he might be otherwise, was Massinissa’s
genuine descendant in the sixth generation, and the last of the old
royal house. A faithful servant of his, Aedemon, after the catastrophe
called the mountain-tribes of the Atlas to arms, and it was only after
a hard struggle that the governor Suetonius Paullinus--the same who
afterwards fought with the Britons (I. 179)--was able to master the
revolt (in the year 42). In the organisation of the new territory
the Romans reverted to the earlier division into an eastern and a
western half, or, as they were thenceforth called from the capitals,
into the provinces of Caesarea and of Tingi; or rather they retained
that division, for it was, as will be afterwards shown, necessarily
suggested by the physical and political relations of the territory,
and must have continued to subsist even under the same sceptre in one
or the other form. Each of these provinces was furnished with imperial
troops of the second class, and placed under an imperial governor not
belonging to the senate.
 
The state and the destinies of this great and peculiar new seat of
Latin civilisation were conditioned by the physical constitution of
North Africa. It is formed by two great mountain-masses, of which the
northern falls steeply towards the Mediterranean, while the southern,
the Atlas, slopes off slowly in the Sahara-steppe dotted with numerous
oases towards the desert proper. A smaller steppe, similar on the whole
to the Sahara and dotted with numerous salt-lakes, serves in the middle
portion, the modern Algeria, to separate the mountains on the north
coast and those on the southern frontier. There are in North Africa no
extensive plains capable of culture; the coast of the Mediterranean
Sea has a level foreland only in a few districts; the land capable of
cultivation, according to the modern __EXPRESSION__ the Tell, consists
essentially of the numerous valleys and slopes within those two broad
mountain-masses, and so extends to its greatest width where, as in the
modern Morocco and in Tunis, no steppe intervenes between the northern
and the southern border.
 
[Sidenote: Tripolis.]
 
The region of Tripolis, politically a part of the province of
Africa, stands as respects its natural relations outside of the
territory described, and is annexed to it in peninsular fashion. The
frontier-range sloping down towards the Mediterranean Sea touches at
the bay of Tacapae (Gabes), with its foreland of steppe and salt-lake,
immediately on the shore. To the south of Tacapae as far as the Great
Syrtis there extends along the coast the narrow Tripolitan island of
cultivation, bounded inland towards the steppe by a chain of moderate
height. Beyond it begins the steppe-country with numerous oases. The
protection of the coast against the inhabitants of the desert is here
of special difficulty, because the high margin of mountains is wanting; and traces of this are apparent in the accounts that have come to us of the military expeditions and the military positions in this region.

댓글 없음: