2014년 11월 30일 일요일

Louis Pasteur 4

Louis Pasteur 4


In the formation of vinegar in contact with air the alcohol disappears,
and is replaced by acetic acid. The air has thus given up something to
the wine. Atmospheric air every one knows to be a mixture of nitrogen
and oxygen, the nitrogen in the proportion of four-fifths of the total
volume, and the oxygen of one-fifth. Well, in the transformation of
wine into vinegar the nitrogen remains inactive. It is the oxygen alone
which enters into combination with the alcohol. You ask for the proof
of this? Take a bottle of wine turned sour, a bottle which at the same
time is stopped hermetically; if the oxygen of the air contained in the
bottle has combined with the alcohol, then, instead of air, there will
be nothing in the bottle but nitrogen gas. Turn the bottle upside down
and open it in a basin of water. The water of the basin will rush into
the bottle to fill the partial vacuum created by the disappearance of
the oxygen. The volume of water which enters the bottle is precisely
equal to a fifth part of the total original volume of the air which the
bottle contained at the time when it was closed. Moreover, it is easy
to show that the gas which remains in the bottle has the properties of
nitrogen gas. A lighted match is extinguished in it as if plunged into
water, and a bird dies immediately in it of asphyxia.

If we confine our knowledge to what has gone before, it would seem that
alcohol diluted with water and exposed to the air ought to furnish
acetic acid. It is not so, however. Pure water alcoholised to the
degree of ordinary wines may remain for whole years in contact with
the air, without the least acetification. In this difference between
natural wine and pure water alcoholised, and exposed to contact with
air, we touch upon a vital point in the phenomena of fermentation. The
celebrated theory of Liebig, which Pasteur was destined to overthrow,
might be thus summed up:--If pure alcoholised water cannot become sour
in contact with air, as is the case with wine, it is because the pure
alcoholised water lacks the albuminoid substance which exists in the
wine in a state of chemical alteration, and which is a ferment capable
of causing the oxygen of the air to combine with the alcohol. And the
proof, according to Liebig, that things act rigorously thus is, that if
you add to the mixture of water and alcohol a little flour, or a little
meat-juice, or even a minute quantity of any vegetable juice, the
acetic fermentation arises, as if by compulsion. In other words, by the
addition of a small quantity of any nitrogenised substance in process
of alteration, you cause the union of the oxygen of the air with the
alcohol.

There is doubtless always in the wine, when it turns sour, a necessary
intermediary, producing the fixation of the oxygen of the air; since
in no circumstances can pure alcohol, diluted to any degree whatever
with pure water, transform itself into vinegar. But this necessary
intermediary is not, as the German theory would have it, a dead
albuminoid substance; it is a plant, and of all plants one of the
simplest and most minute, which has been known from time immemorial
under the name of flower of vinegar. This little fungus is invariably
present on the surface of a wine which is being transformed into
vinegar. Liebig was not ignorant of this, but he regarded it as a
simple coincidence. Do we not know, said he, that whenever an infusion
of organic matter is exposed to the air it becomes covered with a
cryptogamic vegetation, or is invaded by a crowd of animalculæ? Is not
vinegar a vegetable infusion? Vinegar affords a refuge to the flower of
vinegar, just as it gives refuge to what are called the little eels of
vinegar.

We can appreciate here the uncertainties of pure observation. The
great art--and no one practised it better than Pasteur--consists in
instituting decisive experiments which leave no room for an inexact
interpretation of facts. These decisive proofs of the true part
played by the little microscopic fungus, by this flower of vinegar,
this mycoderma aceti, are thus formulated by Pasteur. It is but
another example of the method which he used in alcoholic, lactic, and
tartaric fermentations. The theories of Berzelius, of Mitscherlich,
and of Liebig were destined again to receive the rudest shocks by the
demonstration of these rigorous facts.

Let us place a little wine in a bottle, then hermetically seal it,
and leave it to itself. In these conditions the wine becomes sour.
But if we take the precaution of putting the bottle into hot water,
so that the wine and the air in the bottle may be heated for some
instants to a temperature of 60° Centigrade, and if, after cooling, we
leave the bottle to itself, the wine in these conditions will never
become transformed into vinegar. The heating, however, must have left
intact the albuminoid or nitrogenous substances contained in the
wine. These, then, cannot constitute the ferment of the vinegar. Can
it be maintained that by heating the wine to 60° we have altered the
albuminoid matter, which is, on this account, no longer able to act as
a ferment, or, in other words, no longer able to determine the union
of the oxygen of the air with the alcohol? This hypothesis falls to
pieces before the following experiment. Open the bottle, blow into it
with bellows, so that the once heated wine shall come into contact with
ordinary air, and the acetification of the wine will take place.

But the master experiment is the following. We have seen that pure
alcoholised water never turns sour unless some albuminoid matter is
introduced into it. Pasteur saw that this albuminoid matter might
be completely suppressed and replaced by saline crystallisable
substances, alkaline and earthy phosphates, to which has been added a
little phosphate of ammonia. In these conditions, especially if the
alcoholised water be acidulated by small quantities of pure acetic
acid, one actually sees the mycoderm developing, and the alcohol
transforming itself into acetic acid. It is not possible to demonstrate
in a more convincing manner that the albuminoid matters of the wine are
not in this case the acetic ferment. These albuminoid matters, however,
contribute to the acetic fermentation, but only as being an aliment to
the mycoderma aceti, and notably a nitrogenous aliment. The true and
only ferment of vinegar is the little fungus; it is the great agent of
the phenomenon; it, indeed, accomplishes all.

Is there not a great charm in seeing an obscure subject clearly
illuminated by facts well understood and well interpreted? If in a
bottle containing wine and air and raised to a temperature of 50° or
60° the wine never turns sour, it is because the germs of the mycoderma
aceti, which the wine and the air hold in suspension, are deprived of
all vitality by the heat. Placed, however, in contact with ordinary
air, this once-heated wine can turn sour; because, though the germs of
the mycoderma aceti contained at first in the wine are killed, this
is not the case with those derived from the surrounding air. Pure
alcoholised water never turns sour, even in contact with ordinary air,
and with whatever germs this air may carry, or that may be found in the
dust of the vessels which receive it. The reason is that these germs
cannot become fertile because of the absence of their indispensable
food. Wine in bottles well filled and laid flat do not acetify; this is
because the mycoderm cannot multiply for lack of oxygen. Without doubt
the air constantly penetrates through the pores of the cork, but always
in such feeble quantities that the colouring matters of the wine, and
other more or less oxydisable constituents, take possession of it
without leaving the smallest quantity for the germs of the mycoderm
which are generally suspended in the wine. When the bottle is upright
the conditions are quite altered. The desiccation of the cork renders
it much more permeable to the air, and the germs of the mycoderm on the
surface of the liquid, if any exist there, are enveloped by air.

Thus, to recapitulate in a few words the principles which have just
been established; it is easy to see that the formation of vinegar is
always preceded by the development, on the surface of the wine, of a
little plant formed of strangulated particles, of an extreme tenuity,
and the accumulation of which sometimes takes the form of a hardly
visible veil, sometimes of a wrinkled film of very slight thickness,
and greasy to the touch, because of the various fatty matters which the
plant contains.

This cryptogam has the singular property of condensing considerable
quantities of oxygen and of provoking the _fixation_ of this gas upon
the alcohol, which is thereby transformed into acetic acid. The little
mycoderm is not less exacting than larger vegetables. It must have
its appropriate aliments. Wine offers them in abundance: nitrogenous
matters, the phosphates of magnesia and of potash. The mycoderm
thrives, moreover, in warm climates. To cultivate it in temperate
regions like ours it is well to warm artificially the places where it
is cultivated. But if wine contains within itself all the elements
necessary to the life of the little mycoderm, this life is further
promoted by rendering the wine more acid through the addition of acetic
acid.

What, then, can be more simple than to produce vinegar from wine--a
manufacture which justly makes the reputation of the town of Orleans?
Take some wine, and after having mixed with it one-fourth or one-third
of its volume of vinegar already formed, sow on its surface the little
plant which does the work of acetification. It is only necessary to
skim off, by means of a wooden spatula, a little of the mycodermic film
from a liquid covered with it, and to transfer it to the liquid to be
acetified. The fatty matters which it contains render the wetting of
it difficult. Thus, when we plunge into the liquid the spatula covered
with the film, the latter detaches itself and spreads out over the
surface instead of falling to the bottom. When we operate in summer,
or in a room heated to 15° or 25° Centigrade in winter, in twenty-four
or forty-eight hours at most, the mycoderm covers the whole liquid,
so easy and rapid is its development. After some days all the wine has
become vinegar.

On one occasion, in a discussion which he was holding at the Academy
of Sciences, Pasteur, wishing to affirm the prodigious activity of the
life and multiplication of this little organism, expressed himself
thus:--

'I would undertake in the space of twenty-four hours to cover with
mycoderma aceti a surface of vinous liquid as large as the hall in
which we are here assembled. I should only have to sow in it the day
before almost invisible particles of newly-formed mycoderma aceti.'

Let the reader try to imagine the millions upon millions of little
mycoderma particles which would come to life in that one day.

But how is the mycoderm seed to be obtained in the first instance?
Nothing more simple. The mycoderma aceti is one of those little
so-called 'spontaneous' productions which are sure to appear of
themselves on the surface of liquids or infusions suitable to their
development. In wine, in vinegar, or suspended in air, everywhere
around us, in our towns, in our houses, there exist germs of this
little plant. If we wish to procure some fresh mycoderm it is only
necessary to put a mixture of wine and vinegar into a warm place. In a
few days, generally, if not always, there appear here and there little
greyish patches scattering the light instead of regularly reflecting
it, as does the surrounding liquid. These specks go on increasing
progressively and rapidly. This is the mycoderma aceti raised from
the seeds which the wine or the added vinegar contained, or which the
air deposited; just as we see a field covered with divers weeds by
seeds naturally distributed in the earth, or which have been brought
to it by the wind or by animals. Even in this last circumstance the
comparison holds good, for after you have put wine or vinegar in a
warm place there soon appear, whence we know not, little reddish
flies, so commonly seen in vinegar manufactories, and in all places
where vegetable matter is turning sour. With their feet, or with their
probosces, these flies transport the seed.

                   *       *       *       *       *

At Orleans the process for the manufacture of vinegar is very simple.
Barrels ranged over each other have on each of their vertically-placed
bottoms a circular opening some centimeters in diameter, and a smaller
hole adjacent, called _fausset_, for the air to pass in and out when
the large opening is closed, either by the funnel, through which the
wine is introduced, or by the syphon, which is used for drawing off the
vinegar. These barrels, of which the capacity is 230 litres, are half
filled. The manual labour consists in keeping up a suitable temperature
in the vessel, and in drawing from it every eight days about eight or
ten litres of vinegar, which are replaced by eight or ten litres of
wine.

A barrel in which this give-and-take of wine and vinegar goes on is
technically called a 'mother.' The starting of a 'mother' is not a
rapid process. We begin by introducing into the barrel 100 litres of
very good and very limpid vinegar; then two litres only of wine are
added. Eight days after, three litres of wine are added, a week later
four or five, until the barrel contains about 180 to 200 litres. Then
for the first time vinegar is drawn off in sufficient quantity to bring
back the volume of the liquid to about 100 litres. At this moment the
labours of the 'mother' begin. Henceforward ten litres of vinegar may
be drawn off every eight days, to be replaced by ten litres of wine.
This is the maximum that a cask can yield in a week. When the casks
work badly, as is often the case, it is necessary to diminish their
production.

This Orleans system has many drawbacks. It requires three or four
months to prepare what is called a 'mother,' which must be nourished
with wine _very_ regularly once a week under penalty of seeing it
lose all its power. Then it is necessary to continue the manufacture
at all times, whether the vinegar be required or not. To reconstitute
a 'mother,' one must begin from the very beginning, a process which
involves a loss of three or four months' time. Lastly--a condition
which is at times very inconvenient--a 'mother' cannot be transported
from one place to another, or even from one part of the same locality
to another. The 'mother,' in fact, must rest immovable.

Pasteur advised the suppression of the 'mothers.' He recommended an
apparatus, which is simply a vat, placed in a chamber the temperature
of which can be raised to 20° or 25° Centigrade. In these vats vinegar
already formed is mixed with wine. On the surface is sown the little
plant which converts the wine into vinegar. The mode of sowing it has
been already explained. The acetification begins with the development
of the plant.

A great merchant of Orleans, who had from the first adopted Pasteur's
process, and who had won the prize offered by the 'Society for the
Encouragement of National Industry' for a manufactory perfected after
these principles, has stated that at the end of nine or ten days,
sometimes even in eight, all the acetified wine is converted into
vinegar. From a hundred litres of wine he drew off ninety-five litres
of vinegar. After the great rise of temperature observed at the moment
of the formation of the vinegar, and which is caused by the chemical
union of the alcohol and the oxygen of the air, the vinegar is allowed
to cool. It may then be drawn from the vat, introduced into barrels,
refined, and straightway delivered, fit for consumption. When the vat
is quite emptied, and well cleaned, a new mixture is made of vinegar
and wine, the little plant is sown as before, and the same facts are
reproduced in the second as in the first operation.

                   *       *       *       *       *

In the vessels where vinegar is preserved, whether in the
manufactories, in private houses, or in grocers' shops, it often
happens that the liquid becomes turbid, and impoverished in an
extraordinary manner; it even ends in putrefaction, if a remedy be
not promptly applied. Pasteur has pointed out the cause of these
phenomena. After the alcohol has become acetic acid by the combustive
action of the mycoderm, the question remains, what becomes of the
mycoderm? Most frequently it falls to the bottom of the vessel,
having no more work to accomplish. This is a phase of the manufacture
which must be watched with care. It is shown by the experiments of
Pasteur that the mycoderma aceti can live on vinegar already formed,
maintaining its power of fixing the oxygen on certain constituents of
the liquid. In this case the acetic acid itself is the seat of the
chemical action--in other words, the oxygen unites with the carbon
of the acetic acid, and transforms it into carbonic acid, and as the
acetic acid has a composition which can be represented by carbon and
water, it follows that if the combustion is allowed to take its course,
instead of vinegar we have eventually nothing but water mixed with a
small proportion of nitrogenous and mineral matters, and the remains
of the mycoderm. We have thus an ordinary organic infusion exempt
from all acidity, and one which could not be better fitted to become
the prey of the vibrios of putrefaction or of the aerobic mucors. By
these mucors, moreover, which form a film on the surface of the liquid
after the mycoderm has fallen, the anaerobic vibrios, protected from
the action of the air, can come into active existence. Here we find
ourselves in presence of one of those double phenomena, of putrefaction
in the deeper parts of the liquid, and of combustion at the surface
which is in contact with the air. Nothing is more prejudicial to the
quality of the vinegar than the setting in of this combustion after
the vinegar has been formed, and when it contains no more alcohol. The
first materials of the vinegar upon which the oxygen transmitted by the
mycoderm fixes are, in fact, the ethereal and aromatic constituents
which give to vinegar its chief value.

Another cause of the deterioration of the quality of vinegar, which is
sometimes very annoying to the manufacturer, consists in the frequent
presence of little eel-like organisms, very curious when viewed with a
strong magnifier. Their bodies are so transparent that their internal
organs can be easily distinguished. These eel-like creatures multiply
with extraordinary rapidity. Certainly there is not a single barrel
of vinegar manufactured by the Orleans system which does not contain
them in alarming numbers. Prior to Pasteur's investigations, the
ignorance regarding these organisms was such that they were actually
considered necessary to the production of the vinegar; whereas they
are, on the contrary, most inimical to it, and must, if possible, be
got rid of. This is, moreover, rendered desirable by the repugnance
which is naturally felt to using a liquid defiled by the presence of
such animalcules--a repugnance which becomes almost insurmountable to
anyone who has once seen through a microscope the swarms contained
in a drop of vinegar. The mischief wrought by these little beings in
the manufacture of vinegar results from the fact that they require
air to live. The effect can easily be perceived by filling to the
brim a bottle of vinegar, corking it, and then comparing it with a
similar bottle half filled with the same vinegar, and left uncorked in
contact with the air. In the first bottle, the motions of the eel-like
creatures become gradually slower, until after a few days they cease to
multiply and fall lifeless to the bottom of the vessel. In the second
bottle, on the contrary, they continue to swarm and move about. This
need of oxygen is further demonstrated by the fact that, if the vinegar
reaches a certain depth in the bottle, life is suspended in the lower
parts, and the little eel-like organisms, in order to breathe more
freely, form a crawling zone in the upper layers of the liquid.

Connecting these observations with the other fact that the vinegar
is formed by the action of the mycodermic film on its surface, we can
understand at once that the mycoderm and the little eels continually
carry on a struggle for existence, since both of these living
things--the one animal the other vegetable--imperiously demand the same
aliment, oxygen. They live, moreover, in the same superficial layers, a
circumstance which gives rise to very curious phenomena. When, for one
reason or another, the film of mycoderm is not formed, or when there
is any delay in its production, the little eels invade in such great
numbers the upper layers of the liquid that they absorb all the oxygen.
The little plant has in consequence great difficulty in developing
itself or even in beginning its life. Reciprocally, when the work of
acetification is active, and when the mycoderm has occupied the upper
layers, it gradually drives away the eels, which take refuge, not deep
down, where they would perish, but against the moist sides of the
barrel or the vat. There they form a thick whitish scum all in motion.
It is a very curious spectacle. Here their enemy, the mycoderm, can no
longer injure them to the same extent, since they are surrounded with
air; and here they wait with impatience for the moment when they can
again take their place in the liquid, and, in their turn, fight against
the mycoderm. In Pasteur's process, where the vats are very often
cleansed, it is easy to keep them free from these little animalcules;
they have not time to multiply to a hurtful extent. Indeed, if the
operation be well conducted, they do not make their appearance at all.

                   *       *       *       *       *

Nearly all Pasteur's publications have had from the moment of their
appearance to undergo the severest criticism. Their novelty caused
them to clash with the prejudices and errors current in science. His
researches on fermentation provoked lively opposition. Liebig did not
accept without recrimination a series of researches which concurred in
upsetting the theory he had enunciated and defended in all his works.
After having kept silence for ten years, he published, at Munich, where
he was professor, a long memoir entirely directed against Pasteur's
results. In 1870, on the eve of the war, Pasteur, who was at that time
returning from a scientific journey into Austria, determined to pass
by Munich, with the view of attempting to convince his distinguished
adversary. Liebig received him with great courtesy, but, hardly
recovered from an illness, he alleged his convalescence as a reason for
declining all discussion.

Then followed the Franco-German war. Hardly was it terminated when
Pasteur brought before the Academy of Sciences at Paris a defence
of what he had published, as a sort of challenge to his illustrious
opponent. The memoir of Liebig was filled with the most skilful
arguments.

'I pondered it for nearly ten years before producing it,' he wrote.
Pasteur, putting aside all subtleties of argument, went straight to
the two objections of the German chemist which lay at the root of the
discussion.

It may be remembered that one of the most decisive proofs by which
Pasteur overthrew Liebig's theory resulted from the experiments in
which by the aid of mineral bodies and fermentable matter he produced
a special living ferment for each definite fermentation. By removing
all nitrogenous organic matter, which in Liebig's theory constitutes
the ferment, Pasteur established, at one and the same time, the life
of the ferment and the absence of all action of albuminoid matter in
process of alteration. Liebig here formally contested the fact that
Pasteur had been able to produce yeast and alcoholic fermentation in a
sweetened mineral medium by sowing therein an infinitesimal quantity of
yeast. It is certain that, ten years previously, when Pasteur announced
the production of yeast life and alcoholic fermentation under such
conditions, his experiment was one so difficult to perform that it
sometimes happened to Pasteur himself to be unable to reproduce it. The
cells of yeast sown in the sweetened mineral medium found themselves
often associated with other microscopic organisms, which were
singularly hurtful to the life of the yeast. Pasteur was at this period
far from being familiarised with the delicacy which such experiments
require, and he did not yet know all the precautions indicated later
on, which were indispensable to success. Though in his original memoir
of 1860 Pasteur had pointed out the difficulties of his experiment,
these difficulties existed nevertheless. Liebig took hold of them
with skill, exaggerated them; saw, so to speak, nothing but them; and
declared that the results announced never could have been obtained. But
in 1871 the fundamental experiment of Pasteur, on the life of yeast
in a sweetened mineral medium, had become a trifle for him. He knew
exactly how to form media deprived of all foreign germs, how to prepare
pure yeast, and how to prevent the introduction of new germs, which
could develop in the liquids and hinder the life of the yeast.

'Choose,' said he to Liebig, 'from the members of the Academy one or
several, and ask them to decide between you and me. I am ready to
prepare before you and before them, in a sweetened mineral medium, as
much yeast as you can reasonably ask for, and with substances provided
by yourself.'

Liebig's second objection had reference to acetic fermentation. The
process of acetification known as that of 'beech shavings' is widely
practised in Germany and even in France. It consists in causing alcohol
diluted with water and with the addition of some _milliemes_ of acetic
acid to trickle slowly into barrels or vats filled with shavings of
beech, either massed together without order or disposed in layers
after having been rolled up like the spring of a watch. Openings
formed in the sides of the barrel, and in a double bottom upon which
the shavings rest, permit the access of the air, which rises into the
barrel as it would in a chimney, and yields all or part of its oxygen
to the alcohol to convert it into acetic acid. All writers prior to
Pasteur, and Liebig in particular, maintained that the shavings acted
like porous bodies in the same manner as finely divided platinum. The
acetic acid, they said, was formed by a direct oxidation, without any
other influence than the porosity of the wood. This view of the subject
was rendered plausible by the fact that in many manufactories the
alcohol employed is that of distillation, which contains no albuminoid
substances. Moreover, the duration of the shavings is in a sense
indefinite.

According to Pasteur, the shavings perform only a passive part in
the manufacture. They promote the division of the liquid and cause
a considerable augmentation of the surface exposed to the air. They
moreover serve as a support for the ferment, which is still, according
to him, the mycoderma aceti, under the mucous form proper to it when
submerged.

Certainly appearances were far from being favourable to this view.
When the shavings of a barrel which has been in work for several
months or even for several years are examined, they are found to be
extraordinarily clean. It might be said that they had just been
carefully washed. Pasteur has shown that this is but a deceptive
appearance, and that in reality these shavings are partly or wholly
covered with a mucous film of mycoderma aceti of excessive tenuity.
It is necessary to scrape the surface of the wood with a scalpel and
examine the scrapings with the microscope to be assured of the presence
of this pellicle.

Liebig, who somewhere speaks, not without a certain contempt, of the
microscope, denied formally the exactitude of these assertions.

'With diluted alcohol, which is used for the rapid manufacture of
vinegar,' he wrote, 'the elements of nutrition of the mycoderm are
excluded, and the vinegar is made without its intervention.' He
asserted also in his memoir of 1869 that he had consulted the head of
one of the principal manufactories of vinegar in Germany, that in this
manufactory the diluted alcohol did not receive during the whole course
of its transformation any foreign addition, and that beyond the air and
the surfaces of wood and charcoal--for charcoal is sometimes associated
with the beech shavings--nothing can act upon the alcohol. Liebig added
that the director of the manufactory did not believe at all in the
presence of the mycoderm, and that finally he, Liebig, in examining the
shavings which had been used for twenty-five years in the manufactory,
saw no trace of mycoderm on their surface.

The argument appeared conclusive. How, in fact, could we understand the
production of a plant containing within itself nitrogen and mineral
elements which was nevertheless to be nourished by water and alcohol.

'You do not take into account,' replied Pasteur, 'the nature of the
water which serves to dilute your alcohol. This water, like all
ordinary waters, even the purest, contains salts of ammonia and mineral
matters which are capable of nourishing the plant. Finally, you have
not rightly examined with the microscope the surface of the shavings,
otherwise you would have seen the little particles of the mycoderma
aceti united, in some cases, to a thin film which can even be lifted
up. I propose to you, moreover, to send to the Academic Commission
charged with the decision of the debate, some shavings that you have
obtained yourself in the manufactory at Munich, and in the presence
of its director. I will undertake to prove before the members of
the commission the presence of the mycoderm on the surface of these
shavings.'

Liebig did not accept this challenge. To-day the question is decided.




               _THE QUESTION OF SPONTANEOUS GENERATION._


'All dry bodies,' said Aristotle, 'which become damp, and all damp
bodies which are dried, engender animal life.' Bees, according to
Virgil, are produced from the corrupted entrails of a young bull. At
the time of Louis XIV. we were hardly more advanced. A celebrated
alchemist doctor, Van Helmont, wrote: 'The smells which rise from the
bottom of morasses produce frogs, slugs, leeches, grasses, and other
things.' But most extraordinary of all was the true recipe given by Van
Helmont for producing a pot of mice. It suffices to press a dirty shirt
into the orifice of a vessel containing a little corn. After about
twenty-one days, the ferment proceeding from the dirty shirt modified
by the odour of the corn effects the transmutation of the wheat into
mice. Van Helmont, who asserted that he had witnessed the fact, added
with assurance:

'The mice are born full grown; there are both males and females. To
reproduce the species it suffices to pair them.'

'Scoop out a hole,' said he again, 'in a brick, put into it some sweet
basil, crushed, lay a second brick upon the first so that the hole may
be perfectly covered. Expose the two bricks to the sun, and at the
end of a few days the smell of the sweet basil, acting as a ferment,
will change the herb into real scorpions. An Italian naturalist, Redi,
was the first to subject this question of spontaneous generation to
a more attentive examination. He showed that maggots in meat are not
spontaneously generated, but that they are the larvæ of flies' eggs.
To prevent the production of maggots, Redi showed that it was only
necessary to surround the meat with fine gauze before exposing it to
the air. As no flies could alight upon meat thus protected, there were
no eggs deposited, and consequently neither larvæ nor maggots. But at
the moment when the doctrine of spontaneous generation began to lose
ground by the limitation of its domain, the discovery of the microscope
brought to this doctrine new and formidable support. In presence of
the world of animalculæ, the partisans of spontaneous generation
raised a note of triumph. 'We may have been mistaken,' they said, 'as
to the origin of mice and maggots, but is it possible to believe that
microscopic organisms are not the outcome of spontaneous generation?
How can we otherwise explain their presence and rapid multiplication
in all dead animal or vegetable matter in process of decomposition?'

Buffon lent the authority of his name to the doctrine of spontaneous
generation. He even devised a system to explain this hypothesis. In
1745 two ecclesiastics entered upon an eager controversy for and
against this question. While the English Catholic priest Needham
adopted the theory of spontaneous generation, the Italian priest
Spallanzani energetically opposed it; but while in the eyes of the
public the Italian remained master of the dispute, his success was more
apparent than real, more in word than in deed.

The problem was again brought forward in a more emphatic manner in
1858. M. Pouchet, director of the Museum of Natural History at Rouen,
in addressing the Academy of Sciences, declared that he had succeeded
in demonstrating in a manner absolutely certain the existence of
microscopic living organisms, which had come into the world without
germs, and consequently without parents similar to themselves.

How came Pasteur to throw himself into this discussion, at first
sight so far removed from his other occupations? The results of his
researches on fermentation led him to it as a sort of duty. He was
carried on by a series of logical deductions. Let us recall to mind,
for example, the experiment in which Pasteur exposed to the heat of the
sun water sweetened with sugar and mixed with phosphates of potash
and magnesia, a little sulphate of ammonia, and some carbonate of
lime. In these conditions the lactic fermentation was often seen to
develop itself--that is to say, the sugar became lactic acid, which
combined with the lime of the carbonate to form lactate of lime. This
salt crystallises in long needles, and ends sometimes by filling the
whole vase, while a little organised living thing is at the same time
produced and multiplied. If the experiment is carried on further,
another fermentation generally succeeds to this one. Moving vibrios
make their appearance and multiply, the lactate of lime disappears, the
fluidity returns to the mass, and the lactate finds itself replaced
by butyrate of lime. What a succession of strange phenomena! How did
life appear in this sweetened medium, composed originally of such
simple elements, and apparently so far removed from all production of
life? This lactic ferment, these butyric vibrios, whence do they come?
Are they formed of themselves? or are they produced by germs? If the
latter, whence do the germs come? The appearance of living organised
ferments had become for Pasteur the all-important question, since in
all fermentations he had observed a correlation between the chemical
action set up and the presence of microscopic organisms. Prior to the
establishment of the facts already mentioned, these difficulties did
not exist. The theory of Liebig was universally accepted.

Thus the question as to the origin of microscopic organisms and the
part played by them in fermentation was imposed as a necessity on
Pasteur. He could not proceed further in his researches without having
solved this question.

In the month of October, 1857, Pasteur was called to Paris. After
having been made dean at an incredibly early age, he was now, at the
age of thirty-five, entrusted with the scientific studies at the Ecole
Normale Superieure. But if the position was flattering, it did not
give to Pasteur what he most desired. As he had no Professor's chair,
he had no laboratory. In those days science, and the higher education
in science, were at a discount. It was the period when Claude Bernard
lived in a small damp laboratory, when M. Berthelot, though known
through his great labours, was still nothing more than an assistant in
the College de France.

At the time here referred to, the Minister of Public Instruction said
to Pasteur, 'There is no clause in the budget to grant you 1,500
francs a year to defray the expense of experiments.' Pasteur did not
hesitate to establish a laboratory at his own expense in one of the
garrets of the Ecole Normale. We can readily imagine the modesty of
such an establishment in such a place. Dividing his time between his
professional duties and his laboratory experiments, Pasteur never went
out but to talk over his daily researches with M. Biot, M. Dumas,
M. de Senarmont, and M. Balard. M. Biot especially was his habitual
confidant. The day when M. Biot learned that Pasteur proposed to study
the obscure question of spontaneous generation, he strongly dissuaded
him from entangling himself in this labyrinth. 'You will never escape
from it,' said he, 'you will only lose your time;' and when Pasteur
attempted some timid observations with the view of showing that in
the order of his studies it was indispensable for him to attack this
problem, M. Biot grew angry. Although endowed, as Sainte-Beuve has
said, with all the qualities of curiosity, of subtlety, of penetration,
of ingenious exactitude, of method, and of perspicuity, with all the
qualities, in short, essential and secondary, M. Biot treated the
project of Pasteur as a presumptuous adventure.

Bolder than M. Biot, but with a circumspection always alive, M. Dumas
declared to Pasteur, without, however, further insisting upon the
point, that he would not advise anyone to occupy himself too long with
such a subject. M. de Senarmont alone took the part of Pasteur, and
said to M. Biot:

'Let Pasteur alone. If there is nothing to be found in the path which
he has entered upon, do not be alarmed, he will not continue in it.
But,' added he, 'I should be surprised if he found nothing in it.'

M. Pouchet had previously stated the problem with precision:

'The opponents of spontaneous generation assert that the germs of
microscopic organisms exist in the air, which transports them to a
distance. What, then, will these opponents say if I succeed in inducing
the generation of living organisms, while substituting artificial air
for that of the atmosphere?'

Pouchet then devised this ingenious experiment. He filled a bottle
with boiling water, hermetically sealed it with the greatest care, and
plunged it upside down into a basin of mercury. When the water was
quite cold he uncorked the bottle under the metal, and introduced into
it half a litre of pure oxygen gas, which is as necessary to the life
of the smallest microscopic organism as it is to that of the larger
animals and vegetables. Up to this time there was nothing in the vessel
but pure water and oxygen. Pouchet then introduced a minute bunch of
hay which had been enclosed in a corked bottle, and exposed in a stove
for a long time to a temperature of more than 100 degrees. At the end
of eight days a mouldiness was developed in this infusion of hay.
'Where does this come from?' cried M. Pouchet triumphantly. Certainly
not from the oxygen, which had been prepared from a chemical compound
at the temperature of incandescence. The water had been equally
deprived of germs, since at the boiling temperature all germs would
have been destroyed. The hay also could not have contained them, for it
had been taken from a stove heated to 100 degrees. As it was urged,
however, that certain organisms could resist this temperature, M.
Pouchet heated the hay from 200 to 300 degrees, or to any temperature
that might be desired.

Pasteur came to disturb the triumph of M. Pouchet.

In a lecture which he gave at the Sorbonne in 1864, before a large
assembly composed of savants, philosophers, ladies, priests, and
novelists--Alexandre Dumas was in the first row--all showing eager
interest in the problems to be dealt with in the lecture, Pasteur
thus criticised the experiment of Pouchet: 'This experiment is
irreproachable, but irreproachable only on those points which have
attracted the attention of its author. I will demonstrate before you
that there is a cause of error which M. Pouchet has not perceived,
which he has not in the least suspected, which no one before him
suspected, but which renders his experiment as completely illusory as
that of Van Helmont's pot of dirty linen. I will show you where the
mice got in. I will prove to you, in short, that it is the mercury
which carries the germs into the vessels, or, rather, not to go beyond
the demonstrated fact, the dust which is suspended in the air.'

To render visible this floating dust, Pasteur caused the hall to
be darkened, and pierced the obscurity by a beam of light. There
then appeared, dancing and twirling in the beam, thousands of little
particles of dust.

'If we had time to examine them well,' continued Pasteur, 'we should
see them, though agitated with various movements, falling downwards
more or less quickly. It is thus that all objects become covered with
dust--the furniture, the table, the mercury in this basin. Since this
mercury was taken from the mine, how much dust must have fallen upon
it, to say nothing of all that has been intimately mixed up with it
during the numerous manipulations to which it has been subjected in the
laboratory? It is not possible to touch this mercury, to place the hand
in it, or a bottle, without introducing into the interior of the basin
the dust which lies on its surface. You will now see what takes place.'

Projecting, in the darkness, the beam of light upon the basin of
mercury, the liquid metal shone forth with its usual brilliancy.
Pasteur then sprinkled some dust upon the mercury, and, plunging a
glass rod into it, the dust was seen to travel towards the spot where
the rod entered the mercury, and to penetrate into the space between
the glass and the metal.

'Yes,' exclaimed Pasteur with a voice which gave evidence of the
sincerity of his conviction, 'yes, M. Pouchet had removed the germs
from the water and from the hay, but he had neglected to remove the
dust from the surface of the mercury. This is the cause of his error;
this is what has vitiated his whole arrangement.'

Pasteur then instituted experiments exactly similar to those of
Pouchet, but taking care to remove every cause of error which had
escaped the latter. He employed a glass bulb with a long neck, which
he bent, and connected with a tube of platinum placed in a furnace, so
that it could be heated nearly to redness. In the bulb he placed some
very putrescible liquids--urine for example. When the furnace which
surrounded the platinum tube was in action, Pasteur boiled the liquid
for some minutes, then he allowed it to cool, keeping the fire around
the platinum tube still active. During the cooling of the bulb the
external air was introduced, after having first travelled through the
red-hot platinum tube. The liquid was thus placed in contact with air
whose suspended germs were all burnt up.

In an experiment thus carried out, the urine remains unchanged--it
undergoes only a very slight oxidation, which darkens its colour a
little--but it exhibits no kind of putrefaction. If it be desired
to repeat this experiment with alkaline liquids, such as milk, the
temperature must be raised a little above the boiling point--a
condition easily realised with the apparatus just described. It is
only necessary to connect with the free extremity of the platinum
tube a glass tube bent at right angles, and to plunge the latter
to a depth of some centimeters into a basin of mercury. In these
circumstances ebullition goes on under a pressure greater than that of
the atmosphere, consequently at a temperature higher than 100 degrees
Centigrade.

It remained, however, to be proved that the floating dust of the air
embraces the germs of the lower organisms. Through a tube stopped with
cotton wool, Pasteur, by means of an aspirator, drew ordinary air.
In passing through the wool it was filtered, depositing therein all
its dust. Taking a watch-glass, Pasteur placed on it a drop of water
in which he steeped the cotton wool stopper and squeezed out of it,
upon a glass slide, a drop of water which contained a portion of the
intercepted dust. He repeated this process until he had extracted from
the cotton nearly all the intercepted dust. The operation is simple
and easily executed. Placing the glass slide with a little of the
soiled liquid under a microscope, we can distinguish particles of soot,
fragments of silk, scraps of wool, or of cotton. But, in the midst of
this inanimate dust, living particles make their appearance--that is
to say, organisms belonging to the animal or vegetable kingdom, eggs
of infusoria, and spores of cryptogams. Germs, animalculæ, flakes of
mildew, float in the atmosphere, ready to fall into any appropriate
medium, and to develop themselves at a prodigious rate.

But are these apparently organised particles which are found thus
associated with amorphous dust indeed the germs of microscopic living
beings? Granting the experiment devised by Pasteur to verify that
of Pouchet to be irreproachable, is Pasteur's interpretation of it
rigorously true? In presence of the problem of the origin of life,
all hypotheses are possible as long as the truth has not been clearly
revealed. Truly, it might be argued, if fermentation be caused by
germs, then the air which has passed through a red-hot platinum tube
cannot provoke fermentation, or putrefaction, or the formation of
organisms, because the germs of these last, which were suspended in the
air, have lost all vitality. But what right have you to speak of germs?
How do you know that the previous existence of germs is necessary to
the appearance and development of microscopic organisms? May not the
prime mover of the life of microscopic organisms be some appropriate
medium started into activity by magnetism, electricity, or even ozone?
Now, by the passing of the air through your red-hot platinum tube these
active powers are destroyed, and the sterility of your bulb of urine
has nothing surprising in it.

The partisans of spontaneous generation had often employed this
apparently formidable reasoning, and Pasteur thought it necessary to
strengthen the proof that the cotton wool through which his air had
filtered was really charged with germs.

By an ingenious method he sowed the contents of the cotton wool in the
same liquids that had been rendered sterile by boiling. The liquids
became fertile, even more fertile than if they had been exposed to
the free contact of atmospheric air. Now, what was there in the dust
contained in the cotton wool? Only amorphous particles of silk,
cotton, starch; and, along with these, minute bodies which, by their
transparency and their structure, were not to be distinguished from the
germs of microscopic organisms. The presence of imponderable fluids
could not here be pleaded.

Nevertheless, fearing that determined scepticism might still attribute
to the cotton wool an influence of some sort on account of its being
an organised substance, Pasteur substituted for the stoppers of cotton
wool stoppers of asbestos previously heated to redness. The result was
the same.

                   *       *       *       *       *

Wishing still further to dispose of the hypothesis that, in ordinary
air, an unknown something existed which, independent of germs, might be
the cause of the observed microscopic life, Pasteur began a new series
of experiments as simple as they were demonstrative. Having placed a
very putrescible infusion--in other words, one very appropriate to
the appearance of microscopic organisms--in a glass bulb with a long
neck, by means of the blowpipe, he drew out this neck to a very small
diameter, at the same time bending the soft glass to and fro, so as
to form a sinuous tube. The extremity of this narrow tube remained
open. He then boiled his liquid for some minutes until the vapour of
the water came out in abundance through the narrow open tube. In these
conditions the liquid in the bulb, however putrescible, is preserved
indefinitely without the least alteration. One may handle it, transport
it from place to place, expose it to every variety of climate, place
it in a stove with a temperature of thirty or forty degrees, the
liquid remains as clear as it was at first. A slight oxidation of the
constituents of the liquid, is barely perceptible. In this experiment
the ordinary air, entering suddenly at the first moment, finds in the
bulb a liquid very near the boiling temperature; and when the liquid
is so far cooled that it can no longer destroy the vitality of the
germs, the entrance of the air is correspondingly retarded, so that the
germs capable of acting upon the liquid, and of producing in it living
organisms, are deposited in the bends of the still moist tube, not
coming into contact with the liquid at all.

If, after remaining for weeks, months, or even years, in a heated
chamber, the sinuous neck of the bulb is snipped off by a file in the
vertical part of the stem, after twenty-four or forty-eight hours there
begin to appear mildew, mucors, bacteria, infusoria, exactly as in the
case of infusions recently exposed to the contact of ordinary air.

The same experiments may be repeated with slightly alkaline liquids,
such as milk, the precaution being taken of raising them to a
temperature higher than that of 100 degrees Centigrade.

The great interest of Pasteur's method consists in its proving
unanswerably that the origin of life, in infusions which have been
heated to the boiling point, is solely due to the solid particles
suspended in the air. Of gas, electricity, magnetism, ozone, things
known or unknown, there is nothing in ordinary atmospheric air which, apart from these solid particles, can cause the fermentation or putrefaction of the infusions.

댓글 없음: