Within the next few years, in spite of famine, disease, and a
terrible inundation of the Arno in 1333, the Republic largely extended
its sway. Pistoia, Arezzo, and other places of less account owned
its signory; but an attempt to get possession of Lucca--with
the incongruous aid of the Germans--failed. After the flood, the work
of restoration was first directed by Giotto; and to this epoch we owe
the most beautiful building in Florence, the Campanile. The
discontent, excited by the mismanagement of the war against Lucca, threw
the Republic into the arms of a new and peculiarly atrocious
tyrant, Walter de Brienne, Duke of Athens, a French soldier of
fortune, connected by blood with the _Reali_ of Naples. Elected first as
war captain and chief justice, he acquired credit with the populace
and the magnates by his executions of unpopular burghers; and finally,
on September 8th, 1342, in the Piazza della Signoria, he was
appointed Lord of Florence for life, amidst the acclamations of the
lowest sections of the mob and the paid retainers of the treacherous
nobles. The Priors were driven from their palace, the books of the
Ordinances destroyed, and the Duke's banner erected upon the People's
tower, while the church bells rang out the _Te Deum_. Arezzo, Pistoia,
Colle di Val d'Elsa, San Gemignano, and Volterra acknowledged his rule;
and with a curious mixture of hypocrisy, immorality, and
revolting cruelty, he reigned as absolute lord until the following
summer, backed by French and Burgundian soldiers who flocked to him from
all quarters. By that time he had utterly disgusted all classes in
the State, even the magnates by whose favour he had won his throne and
the populace who had acclaimed him; and on the Feast of St. Anne,
July 26th, 1343, there was a general rising. The instruments of his
cruelty were literally torn to pieces by the people, and he was besieged
in the Palazzo Vecchio, which he had transformed into a fortress, and
at length capitulated on August 3rd. The Sienese and Count Simone
de' Conti Guidi, who had come to mediate, took him over the
Ponte Rubaconte, through the Porta San Niccolo and thence into
the Casentino, where they made him solemnly ratify his
abdication.
"Note," says Giovanni Villani, who was present at most of
these things and has given us a most vivid picture of them, "that even as the
Duke with fraud and treason took away the liberty of the Republic
of Florence on the day of Our Lady in September,[13] not regarding
the reverence due to her, so, as it were in divine vengeance,
God permitted that the free citizens with armed hand should win it back
on the day of her mother, Madonna Santa Anna, on the 26th day of
July 1343; and for this grace it was ordained by the Commune that the
Feast of St. Anne should ever be kept like Easter in Florence, and
that there should be celebrated a solemn office and great offerings by
the Commune and all the Arts of Florence." St. Anne henceforth became
the chief patroness and protectoress of the Republic, as Fra
Bartolommeo painted her in his great unfinished picture in the Uffizi; and
the solemn office and offerings were duly paid and celebrated in Or
San Michele. One of Villani's minor grievances against the Duke is that
he introduced frivolous French fashions of dress into the city, instead of
the stately old Florentine costume, which the republicans considered to be
the authentic garb of ancient Rome. That there was some ground for this
complaint will readily be seen, by comparing the figure of a French cavalier
in the Allegory of the Church in the Spanish Chapel at Santa Maria Novella
(the figure formerly called Cimabue and now sometimes said to represent
Walter de Brienne himself), with the simple grandeur and dignity of the dress
worn by the burghers on their tombs in Santa Croce, or by Dante in the
Duomo portrait.
[13] _i.e._ The Nativity of the Blessed
Virgin.
Only two months after the expulsion of the Duke of Athens, the
great quarrel between the magnates and the people was fought to a finish,
in September 1343. On the northern side of the Arno, the magnates
made head at the houses of the Adimari near San Giovanni, at the opening
of the present Via Calzaioli, where one of their towers still stands,
at the houses of the Pazzi and Donati in the Piazza di San Pier
Maggiore, and round those of the Cavalcanti in Mercato Nuovo. The people
under their great gonfalon and the standards of the companies, led by
the Medici and Rondinelli, stormed one position after another, forcing
the defenders to surrender. On the other side of the Arno, the
magnates and their retainers held the bridges and the narrow streets
beyond. The Porta San Giorgio was in their hands, and, through
it, reinforcements were hurried up from the country. Repulsed at the
Ponte Vecchio and the Ponte Rubaconte, the forces of the people with
their victorious standards at last carried the Ponte alla Carraia, which
was held by the Nerli; and next, joined by the populace of the
Oltrarno, forced the Rossi and Frescobaldi to yield. The Bardi alone
remained; and, in that narrow street which still bears their name, and on
the Ponte Vecchio and the Ponte Rubaconte, they withstood
single-handed the onslaught of the whole might of the people, until they
were assailed in the rear from the direction of the Via Romana.
The infuriated populace sacked their houses, destroyed and burned
the greater part of their palaces and towers. The long struggle
between _grandi_ and _popolani_ was thus ended at last. "This was the
cause," says Machiavelli, "that Florence was stripped not only of all
martial skill, but also of all generosity." The government was again
reformed, and the minor arts admitted to a larger share; between the
_popolo grosso_ and them, between burghers and populace, lay the struggle
now, which was to end in the Medicean rule.
But on all these perpetual
changes in the form of the government of Florence the last word had, perhaps,
been said in Dante's sarcastic outburst a quarter of a century
before:--
"Atene e Lacedemone, che fenno l'antiche leggi,
e furon si civili, fecero al viver bene un picciol cenno verso
di te, che fai tanto sottili provvedimenti, che a mezzo
novembre non giunge quel che tu d'ottobre fili. Quante volte
del tempo che rimembre, legge, moneta, offizio, e costume
hai tu mutato, e rinnovato membre? E se ben ti ricordi, e vedi
lume, vedrai te simigliante a quella inferma, che non puo
trovar posa in su le piume, ma con dar volta suo dolore
scherma."[14]
[14] _Purg. VI._-- "Athens and Lacedæmon, they
who made The ancient laws, and were so civilised, Made
towards living well a little sign Compared with thee, who makest such
fine-spun Provisions, that to middle of November Reaches not
what thou in October spinnest. How oft, within the time of thy
remembrance, Laws, money, offices and usages Hast thou
remodelled, and renewed thy members? And if thou mind thee well, and see
the light, Thou shalt behold thyself like a sick woman, Who
cannot find repose upon her down, But by her tossing wardeth off her
pain." --_Longfellow._
The terrible pestilence, known as the
Black Death, swept over Europe in 1348. During the five months in which it
devastated Florence three-fifths of the population perished, all civic life
was suspended, and the gayest and most beautiful of cities seemed for a while
to be transformed into the dim valley of disease and sin that
lies outstretched at the bottom of Dante's Malebolge. It has
been described, in all its horrors, in one of the most famous passages
of modern prose--that appalling introduction to Boccaccio's
_Decameron_. From the city in her agony, Boccaccio's three noble youths and
seven "honest ladies" fled to the villas of Settignano and Fiesole,
where they strove to drown the horror of the time by their music
and dancing, their feasting and too often sadly obscene stories.
Giovanni Villani was among the victims in Florence, and Petrarch's Laura
at Avignon. The first canto of Petrarch's _Triumph of Death_ appears
to be, in part, an allegorical representation--written many
years later--of this fearful year.
During the third quarter of this
fourteenth century--the years which still saw the Popes remaining in their
Babylonian exile at Avignon--the Florentines gradually regained their lost
supremacy over the cities of Tuscany: Colle di Val d'Elsa, San Gemignano,
Prato, Pistoia, Volterra, San Miniato dei Tedeschi. They carried on a
war with the formidable tyrant of Milan, the Archbishop Giovanni
Visconti, whose growing power was a perpetual menace to the liberties of
the Tuscan communes. They made good use of the descent of the
feeble emperor, Charles IV., into Italy; waged a new war with their
old rival, Pisa; and readily accommodated themselves to the
baser conditions of warfare that prevailed, now that Italy was the prey
of the companies of mercenaries, ready to be hired by whatever prince
or republic could afford the largest pay, or to fall upon whatever
city seemed most likely to yield the heaviest ransom. Within the
State itself the _popolo minuto_ and the Minor Guilds were advancing
in power; Florence was now divided into four quarters (San Giovanni, Santa
Maria Novella, Santa Croce, Santo Spirito), instead of the old Sesti; and the
Signoria was now composed of the Gonfaloniere and _eight_ Priors, two from
each quarter (instead of the former six), of whom two belonged to the Minor
Arts. These, of course, still held office for only two months. Next came the
twelve Buonuomini, who were the counsellors of the Signoria, and held office
for three months; and the sixteen Gonfaloniers of the city companies, four
from each quarter, holding office for four months. And there were, as
before, the two great Councils of the People and the Commune; and still
the three great officers who carried out their decrees, the Podesta,
the Captain, the Executor of Justice. The feuds of Ricci and Albizzi
kept up the inevitable factions, much as the Buondelmonti and
Uberti, Cerchi and Donati had done of old; and an iniquitous system
of "admonishing" those who were suspected of Ghibelline descent
(the _ammoniti_ being excluded from office under heavy penalties)
threw much power into the hands of the captains of the Parte Guelfa,
whose oppressive conduct earned them deadly hatred. "To such
arrogance," says Machiavelli, "did the captains of the Party mount, that they
were feared more than the members of the Signoria, and less reverence
was paid to the latter than to the former; the palace of the Party
was more esteemed than that of the Signoria, so that no ambassador came
to Florence without having commissions to the
captains."
[Illustration: THE CAMPANILE]
Pope Gregory XI
preceded his return to Rome by an attempted reconquest of the States of the
Church, by means of foreign legates and hireling soldiers, of whom the worst
were Bretons and English; although St. Catherine of Siena implored him, in
the name of Christ, to come with the Cross in hand, like a meek lamb, and not
with armed bands. The horrible atrocities committed in Romagna by these
mercenaries, especially at Faenza and Cesena, stained what might have been a
noble pontificate. Against Pope Gregory and his legates, the
Florentines carried on a long and disastrous war; round the Otto della
Guerra, the eight magistrates to whom the management of the war was
intrusted, rallied those who hated the Parte Guelfa. The return of Gregory
to Rome in 1377 opens a new epoch in Italian history. Echoes of
this unnatural struggle between Florence and the Pope reach us in
the letters of St Catherine and the canzoni of Franco Sacchetti; in
the latter is some faint sound of Dante's _saeva indignatio_ against
the unworthy pastors of the Church, but in the former we are lifted
far above the miserable realities of a conflict carried on by
political intrigue and foreign mercenaries, into the mystical realms of
pure faith and divine charity.
In 1376, the Loggia dei Priori, now
less pleasantly known as the Loggia dei Lanzi, was founded; and in 1378 the
bulk of the Duomo was practically completed. This may be taken as the close
of the first or "heroic" epoch of Florentine Art, which runs simultaneously
with the great democratic period of Florentine history, represented
in literature by Dante and Boccaccio. The Duomo, the Palace of
the Podesta, the Palace of the Priors, Santa Maria Novella, Santa
Croce, Or San Michele, the Loggia of the Bigallo, and the Third Walls of
the City (of which, on the northern side of the Arno, the gates
alone remain), are its supreme monuments in architecture. Its heroes
of greatest name are Arnolfo di Cambio, Giotto di Bondone, Andrea
Pisano, Andrea di Cione or Orcagna (the "Archangel"), and, lastly and
but recently recognised, Francesco Talenti.
"No Italian architect,"
says Addington Symonds, "has enjoyed the proud privilege of stamping his own
individuality more strongly on his native city than Arnolfo." At present, the
walls of the city (or what remains of them)--_le mura di Fiorenza_ which Lapo
Gianni would fain see _inargentate_--and the bulk of the Palazzo Vecchio and
Santa Croce, alone represent Arnolfo's work. But the Duomo (mainly, in
its present form, due to Francesco Talenti) probably still retains in part
his design; and the glorious Church of Or San Michele, of which the actual
architect is not certainly known, stands on the site of
his Loggia.
Giovanni Cimabue, the father of Florentine painting as
Arnolfo of Florentine architecture, survives only as a name in Dante's
immortal verse. Not a single authentic work remains from his hand in
Florence. His supposed portrait in the cloisters of Santa Maria Novella is
now held to be that of a French knight; the famous picture of the
Madonna and Child with her angelic ministers, in the Rucellai Chapel, is
shown to be the work of a Sienese master; and the other paintings
once ascribed to him have absolutely no claims to bear his name. But
the Borgo Allegro still bears its title from the rejoicings that
hailed his masterpiece, and perhaps it is best that his achievement
should thus live, only as a holy memory:--
"Credette Cimabue
nella pittura tener lo campo, ed ora ha Giotto il grido, si che
la fama di colui e oscura."[15]
[15] "In painting Cimabue thought that
he Should hold the field, now Giotto has the cry, So that
the other's fame is growing dim."
Of Cimabue's great pupil, Dante's
friend and contemporary, Giotto, we know and possess much more. Through him
mediæval Italy first spoke out through painting, and with no uncertain sound.
He was born some ten years later than Dante. Cimabue--or so the legend runs,
which is told by Leonardo da Vinci amongst others--found him among the
mountains, guarding his father's flocks and drawing upon the stones the
movements of the goats committed to his care. He was a typical
Florentine craftsman; favoured by popes, admitted to the familiarity of
kings, he remained to the end the same unspoilt shepherd whom Cimabue had
found. Many choice and piquant tales are told by the novelists about
his ugly presence and rare personality, his perpetual good humour,
his sharp and witty answers to king and rustic alike, his hatred of
all pretentiousness, carried to such an extent that he conceived a
rooted objection to hearing himself called _maestro_. Padua and
Assisi possess some of his very best work; but Florence can still show
much. Two chapels in Santa Croce are painted by his hand; of the
smaller pictures ascribed to him in churches and galleries, there is
one authentic--the Madonna in the Accademia; and, perhaps most
beautiful of all, the Campanile which he designed and commenced still rises
in the midst of the city. Giotto died in 1336; his work was carried on
by Andrea Pisano and practically finished by Francesco Talenti.
Andrea
di Ugolino Pisano (1270-1348), usually simply called Andrea Pisano, is
similarly the father of Florentine sculpture. Vasari's curiously inaccurate
account of him has somewhat blurred his real figure in the history of art.
His great achievements are the casting of the first gate of the Baptistery in
bronze, his work--apparently from Giotto's designs--in the lower series of
marble reliefs round the Campanile, and his continuation of the Campanile
itself after Giotto's death. He is said by Vasari to have built the Porta di
San Frediano.
There is little individuality in the followers of Giotto,
who carried on his tradition and worked in his manner. They are very much
below their master, and are often surpassed by the contemporary painters
of Siena, such as Simone Martini and Ambrogio Lorenzetti. Taddeo Gaddi and
his son, Agnolo, Giovanni di Milano, Bernardo Daddi, are their leaders; the
chief title to fame of the first-named being the renowned Ponte Vecchio. But
their total achievement, in conjunction with the Sienese, was of heroic
magnitude. They covered the walls of churches and chapels, especially those
connected with the Franciscans and Dominicans, with the scenes of Scripture,
with the lives of Madonna and her saints; they set forth in all its fullness
the whole Gospel story, for those who could neither read nor write; they
conceived vast allegories of human life and human destinies; they filled the
palaces of the republics with painted parables of good government. "By
the grace of God," says a statute of Sienese painters, "we are the men
who make manifest to the ignorant and unlettered the miraculous
things achieved by the power and virtue of the Faith." At Siena, at Pisa
and at Assisi, are perhaps the greatest works of this school; but here,
in Santa Croce and Santa Maria Novella, there is much, and of a very noble
and characteristic kind. Spinello Aretino (1333-1410) may be regarded as the
last of the Giotteschi; you may see his best series of frescoes in San
Miniato, setting forth with much skill and power the life of the great
Italian monk, whose face Dante so earnestly prayed to behold unveiled in
Paradise.
This heroic age of sculpture and painting culminated in Andrea
Orcagna (1308-1368), Andrea Pisano's great pupil. Painter and
sculptor, architect and poet, Orcagna is at once the inheritor of Niccolo
and Giovanni Pisano, and of Giotto. The famous frescoes in the Pisan
Campo Santo are now known to be the work of some other hand; his
paintings in Santa Croce, with their priceless portraits, have perished;
and, although frequently consulted in the construction of the Duomo, it
is tolerably certain that he was not the architect of any of
the Florentine buildings once ascribed to him. The Strozzi chapel of
St Thomas in Santa Maria Novella, the oratory of the Madonna in
San Michele in Orto, contain all his extant works; and they are sufficient
to prove him, next to Giotto, the greatest painter of his century, with a
feeling for grace and beauty even above Giotto's, and only less excellent in
marble. Several of his poems have been preserved, mostly of a slightly
satirical character; one, a sonnet on the nature of love, _Molti volendo dir
che fosse Amore_, has had the honour of being ascribed to Dante.
With
the third quarter of the century, the first great epoch of Italian letters
closes also. On the overthrow of the House of Suabia at Benevento, the centre
of culture had shifted from Sicily to Tuscany, from Palermo to Florence. The
prose and poetry of this epoch is almost entirely Tuscan, although the second
of its greatest poets, Francesco Petrarca, comparatively seldom set foot
within its boundaries. "My old nest is restored to me," he wrote to the
Signoria, when they sent Boccaccio to invite his friend to return to
Florence, "I can fly back to it, and I can fold there my wandering wings."
But, save for a few flying visits, Petrarch had little inclination
to attach himself to one city, when he felt that all Italy was
his country.
Dante had set forth all that was noblest in mediæval
thought in imperishable form, supremely in his _Divina Commedia_, but
appreciably and nobly in his various minor works as well, both verse and
prose. Villani had started historical Italian prose on its triumphant
course. Petrarch and Boccaccio, besides their great gifts to
Italian literature, in the ethereal poetry of the one, painting every
varying mood of the human soul, and the licentious prose of the other,
hymning the triumph of the flesh, stand on the threshold of the
Renaissance. Other names crowd in upon us at each stage of this epoch. Apart
from his rare personality, Guido Cavalcanti's _ballate_ are his chief
title to poetic fame, but, even so, less than the monument of glory
that Dante has reared to him in the _Vita Nuova_, in the _De
Vulgari Eloquentia_, in the _Divina Commedia_. Dino Compagni, the
chronicler of the Whites and Blacks, was only less admirable as a patriot
than as a historian. Matteo Villani, the brother of Giovanni, and
Matteo's son, Filippo, carried on the great chronicler's work. Fra
Jacopo Passavanti, the Dominican prior of Santa Maria Novella, in the
middle of the century, showed how the purest Florentine vernacular could
be used for the purpose of simple religious edification. Franco Sacchetti,
politician, novelist and poet, may be taken as the last Florentine writer of
this period; he anticipates the popular lyrism of the Quattrocento, rather in
the same way as a group of scholars who at the same time gathered round the
Augustinian, Luigi Marsili, in his cell at Santo Spirito heralds the coming
of the humanists. It fell to Franco Sacchetti to sing the dirge of this
heroic period of art and letters, in his elegiac canzoni on the deaths of
Petrarch and Boccaccio:--
"Sonati sono i corni d'ogni
parte a ricolta; la stagione e rivolta: se tornera non so, ma
credo tardi."
[Illustration: CROSS OF THE FLORENTINE PEOPLE (FROM OLD
HOUSE ON NORTH SIDE OF DUOMO)]
CHAPTER III
_The
Medici and the Quattrocento_
"Tiranno e nome di uomo di mala vita, e
pessimo fra tutti gli altri uomini, che per forza sopra tutti vuol
regnare, massime quello che di cittadino e fatto
tiranno."--_Savonarola._
"The Renaissance of the fifteenth century was
in many things great, rather by what it designed or aspired to do, than by
what it actually achieved."--_Walter Pater._
_Non gia Salvestro
ma Salvator mundi_, "thou that with noble wisdom hast saved thy country."
Thus in a sonnet does Franco Sacchetti hail Salvestro dei Medici, the
originator of the greatness of his house. In 1378, while the hatred between
the Parte Guelfa and the adherents of the Otto della Guerra--the rivalry
between the Palace of the Party and the Palace of the Signory--was at its
height, the Captains of the Party conspired to seize upon the Palace of the
Priors and take possession of the State. Their plans were frustrated by
Salvestro dei Medici, a rich merchant and head of his ambitious and rising
family, who was then Gonfaloniere of Justice. He proposed to restore
the Ordinances against the magnates, and, when this petition was
rejected by the Signoria and the Colleges,[16] he appealed to the Council
of the People. The result was a riot, followed by a long series of tumults
throughout the city; the _Arti Minori_ came to the front in arms; and,
finally, the bloody revolution known as the Tumult of the Ciompi burst over
Florence. These Ciompi, the lowest class of artizans and all those who were
not represented in the Arts, headed by those who were subject to the great
Arte della Lana, had been much favoured by the Duke of Athens, and had been
given consuls and a standard with an angel painted upon it. On the fall of
the Duke, these Ciompi, or _popolo minuto_, had lost these privileges, and
were probably much oppressed by the consuls of the Arte della Lana. Secretly
instigated by Salvestro--who thus initiated the Medicean policy of
undermining the Republic by means of the populace--they rose _en masse_ on
July 20th, captured the Palace of the Podesta, burnt the houses of
their enemies and the Bottega of the Arte della Lana, seized the standard
of the people, and, with it and the banners of the Guilds displayed,
came into the Piazza to demand a share in the government. On July 22nd
they burst into the Palace of the Priors, headed by a wool-comber,
Michele di Lando, carrying in his hands the great Gonfalon; him they
acclaimed Gonfaloniere and lord of the city.
[16] The "Colleges"
were the twelve Buonuomini and the sixteen Gonfaloniers of the Companies.
Measures proposed by the Signoria had to be carried in the Colleges before
being submitted to the Council of the People, and afterwards to the Council
of the Commune.
This rough and half-naked wool-comber, whose mother made
pots and pans and whose wife sold greens, is one of the heroes of
Florentine history; and his noble simplicity throughout the whole affair is
in striking contrast with the self-seeking and intrigues of the
rich aristocratic merchants whose tool, to some extent, he appears to
have been. The pious historian, Jacopo Nardi, likens him to the heroes
of ancient Rome, Curius and Fabricius, and ranks him as a patriot
and deliverer of the city, far above even Farinata degli Uberti. The
next day the Parliament was duly summoned in the Piazza, Michele
confirmed in his office, and a Balia (or commission) given to him, together
with the Eight and the Syndics of the Arts, to reform the State and
elect the new Signoria--in which the newly constituted Guilds of
the populace were to have a third with those of the greater and
minor Arts. But, before Michele's term of office was over, the Ciompi
were in arms again, fiercer than ever and with more outrageous
demands, following the standards of the Angel and some of the minor Arts
(who appear to have in part joined them). From Santa Maria Novella,
their chosen head-quarters, on the last day of August they sent
two representatives to overawe the Signoria. But Michele di
Lando, answering their insolence with violence, rode through the city
with the standard of Justice floating before him, while the great bell
of the Priors' tower called the Guilds to arms; and by evening
the populace had melted away, and the government of the people
was re-established. The new Signoria was greeted in a canzone
by Sacchetti, in which he declares that Prudence, Justice, Fortitude,
and Temperance are once more reinstated in the city.
For the next few
years the Minor Arts predominated in the government. Salvestro dei Medici
kept in the background, but was presently banished. Michele di Lando seemed
contented to have saved the State, and took little further share in the
politics of the city. He appears later on to have been put under bounds at
Chioggia; but to have returned to Florence before his death in 1401, when he
was buried in Santa Croce. There were still tumults and conspiracies,
resulting in frequent executions and banishments; while, without, inglorious
wars were carried on by the companies of mercenary soldiers. This is
the epoch in which the great English captain, Hawkwood, entered
the service of the Florentine State. In 1382, after the execution
of Giorgio Scali and the banishment of Tommaso Strozzi (noble burghers who
headed the populace), the newly constituted Guilds were abolished, and the
government returned to the greater Arts, who now held two-thirds of the
offices--a proportion which was later increased to three-quarters.
The
period which follows, from 1382 to 1434, sees the close of the democratic
government of Florence. The Republic, nominally still ruled by the greater
Guilds, is in reality sustained and swayed by the _nobili popolani_ or
_Ottimati_, members of wealthy families risen by riches or talent out of
these greater Guilds into a new kind of burgher aristocracy. The struggle is
now no longer between the Palace of the Signory and the Palace of the
Party--for the days of the power of the Parte Guelfa are at an end--but
between the Palace and the Piazza. The party of the Minor Arts and the
Populace is repressed and ground down with war taxes; but behind them the
Medici lurk and wait--first Vieri, then Giovanni di Averardo, then Cosimo
di Giovanni--ever on the watch to put themselves at their head,
and through them overturn the State. The party of the Ottimati is
first led by Maso degli Albizzi, then by Niccolo da Uzzano, and lastly
by Rinaldo degli Albizzi and his adherents--illustrious citizens
not altogether unworthy of the great Republic that they swayed--the
sort of dignified civic patricians whose figures, a little later, were
to throng the frescoes of Masaccio and Ghirlandaio. But they were
divided among themselves, persecuted their adversaries with proscription
and banishment, thus making the exiles a perpetual source of danger to
the State, and they were hated by the populace because of the war
taxes. These wars were mainly carried on by mercenaries--who were now
more usually Italians than foreigners--and, in spite of frequent
defeats, generally ended well for Florence. Arezzo was purchased in 1384.
A fierce struggle was carried on a few years later (1390-1402) with
the "great serpent," Giovanni Galeazzo Visconti, who hoped to make
himself King of Italy by violence as he had made himself Duke of Milan
by treachery, and intended to be crowned in Florence. Pisa was finally and
cruelly conquered in 1406; Cortona was obtained as the result of a prolonged
war with King Ladislaus of Naples in 1414, in which the Republic had seemed
once more in danger of falling into the hands of a foreign tyrant; and in
1421 Leghorn was sold to the Florentines by the Genoese, thus opening the sea
to their merchandise.
The deaths of Giovanni Galeazzo and Ladislaus freed
the city from her most formidable external foes; and for a while she became
the seat of the Papacy, the centre of Christendom. In 1419, after the schism,
Pope Martin V. took up his abode in Florence; the great
condottiere, Braccio, came with his victorious troops to do him honour; and
the deposed John XXIII. humbled himself before the new Pontiff, and was
at last laid to rest among the shadows of the Baptistery. In his
_Storia Florentina_ Guicciardini declares that the government at this
epoch was the wisest, the most glorious and the happiest that the city
had ever had. It was the dawn of the Renaissance, and Florence was
already full of artists and scholars, to whom these _nobili popolani_ were
as generous and as enlightened patrons as their successors, the
Medici, were to be. Even Cosimo's fervent admirer, the librarian
Vespasiano Bisticci, endorses Guicciardini's verdict: "In that time," he
says, "from 1422 to 1433, the city of Florence was in a most blissful
state, abounding with excellent men in every faculty, and it was full
of admirable citizens."
Maso degli Albizzi died in 1417; and his
successors in the oligarchy--the aged Niccolo da Uzzano, who stood throughout
for moderation, and the fiery but less competent Rinaldo
degli Albizzi--were no match for the rising and unscrupulous Medici.
With the Albizzi was associated the noblest and most generous Florentine
of the century, Palla Strozzi. The war with Filippo Visconti, resulting in
the disastrous rout of Zagonara, and an unjust campaign against Lucca, in
which horrible atrocities were committed by the Florentine commissioner,
Astorre Gianni, shook their government. Giovanni dei Medici, the richest
banker in Italy, was now the acknowledged head of the opposition; he had been
Gonfaloniere in 1421, but would not put himself actively forward, although
urged on by his sons, Cosimo and Lorenzo. He died in 1429; Niccolo da Uzzano
followed him to the grave in 1432; and the final struggle between the fiercer
spirits, Rinaldo and Cosimo, was at hand. "All these citizens," said Niccolo,
shortly before his death, "some through ignorance, some through malice,
are ready to sell this republic; and, thanks to their good fortune,
they have found the purchaser."
Shortly before this date, Masaccio
painted all the leading spirits of the time in a fresco in the cloisters of
the Carmine. This has been destroyed, but you may see a fine contemporary
portrait of Giovanni in the Uffizi. The much admired and famous coloured bust
in the Bargello, called the portrait of Niccolo da Uzzano by Donatello, has
probably nothing to do either with Niccolo or with Donatello. Giovanni has
the air of a prosperous and unpretending Florentine tradesman, but with
a certain obvious parade of his lack of pushfulness.
In 1433 the storm
broke. A Signory hostile to Cosimo being elected, he was summoned to the
Palace and imprisoned in an apartment high up in the Tower, a place known as
the Alberghettino. Rinaldo degli Albizzi held the Piazza with his soldiery,
and Cosimo heard the great bell ringing to call the people to Parliament, to
grant a Balia to reform the government and decide upon his fate. But he was
too powerful at home and abroad; his popularity with those whom he had raised
from low estate, and those whom he had relieved by his wealth, his
influence with the foreign powers, such as Venice and Ferrara, were so
great that his foes dared not take his life; and, indeed, they were
hardly the men to have attempted such a crime. Banished to Padua (his
brother Lorenzo and other members of his family being put under bounds
at different cities), he was received everywhere, not as a fugitive,
but as a prince; and the library of the Benedictines, built by
Michelozzo at his expense, once bore witness to his stay in Venice. Hardly a
year had passed when a new Signory was chosen, favourable to the
Medici; Rinaldo degli Albizzi, after a vain show of resistance, laid down
his arms on the intervention of Pope Eugenius, who was then at Santa
Maria Novella, and was banished for ever from the city with his
principal adherents. And finally, in a triumphant progress from Venice,
"carried back to his country upon the shoulders of all Italy," as he
said, Cosimo and his brother Lorenzo entered Florence on October 6th,
1434, rode past the deserted palaces of the Albizzi to the Palace of
the Priors, and next day returned in triumph to their own house in the
Via Larga.
The Republic had practically fallen; the head of the Medici
was virtually prince of the city and of her fair dominion. But
Florence was not Milan or Naples, and Cosimo's part as tyrant was a
peculiar one. The forms of the government were, with modifications,
preserved; but by means of a Balia empowered to elect the chief magistrates
for a period of five years, and then renewed every five years, he
secured that the Signoria should always be in his hands, or in those of
his adherents. The grand Palace of the Priors was still ostensibly
the seat of government; but, in reality, the State was in the firm
grasp of the thin, dark-faced merchant in the Palace in the Via Larga,
which we now know as the Palazzo Riccardi. Although in the earlier part
of his reign he was occasionally elected Gonfaloniere, he otherwise
held no office ostensibly, and affected the republican manner of a
mere wealthy citizen. His personality, combined with the widely
ramifying banking relations of the Medici, gave him an almost
European influence. His popularity among the mountaineers and in the
country districts, from which armed soldiery were ever ready to pour down
into the city in his defence, made him the fitting man for the
ever increasing external sway of Florence. The forms of the Republic
were preserved, but he consolidated his power by a general levelling
and disintegration, by severing the nerves of the State and breaking
the power of the Guilds. He had certain hard and cynical maxims
for guidance: "Better a city ruined than a city lost," "States are
not ruled by Pater-Nosters," "New and worthy citizens can be made by a
few ells of crimson cloth." So he elevated to wealth and power men of
low kind, devoted to and dependent on himself; crushed the
families opposed to him, or citizens who seemed too powerful, by
wholesale banishments, or by ruining them with fines and taxation,
although there was comparatively little blood shed. He was utterly ruthless
in all this, and many of the noblest Florentine citizens fell victims. One
murder must be laid to his charge, and it is one of peculiar, for him,
unusual atrocity. Baldaccio d'Anghiari, a young captain of infantry, who
promised fair to take a high place among the condottieri of the day, was
treacherously invited to speak with the Gonfaloniere in the Palace of the
Priors, and there stabbed to death by hireling assassins from the hills, and
his body flung ignominiously into the Piazza. Cosimo's motive is said to have
been partly jealousy of a possible rival, Neri Capponi, who had won
popularity by his conquest of the Casentino for Florence in 1440, and who was
intimate with Baldaccio; and partly desire to gratify Francesco Sforza,
whose treacherous designs upon Milan he was furthering by the gold
wrung from his over-taxed Florentines, and to whose plans Baldaccio
was prepared to offer an obstacle.
Florence was still for a time the
seat of the Papacy. In January 1439, the Patriarch Joseph of Constantinople,
and the Emperor of the East, John Paleologus, came to meet Pope Eugenius for
the Council of Florence, which was intended to unite the Churches of
Christendom. The Patriarch died here, and is buried in Santa Maria Novella.
In the Riccardi Palace you may see him and the Emperor, forced, as it
were, to take part in the triumph of the Medici in Benozzo
Gozzoli's fresco--riding with them in the gorgeous train, that sets
out ostensibly to seek the Babe of Bethlehem, and evidently has
no intention of finding Him. Pope Eugenius returned to Rome in 1444;
and in 1453 Mahomet II. stormed Constantinople, and Greek exiles
thronged to Rome and Florence. In 1459, marvellous pageants greeted Pius II.
in the city, on his way to stir up the Crusade that never went.
In his
foreign policy Cosimo inaugurated a totally new departure for Florence; he
commenced a line of action which was of the utmost importance in Italian
politics, and which his son and grandson carried still further. The long wars
with which the last of the Visconti, Filippo Maria, harassed Italy and
pressed Florence hard (in the last of these Rinaldo degli Albizzi and the
exiles approached near enough to catch a distant glimpse of the city from
which they were relentlessly shut out), ended with his death in 1447. Cosimo
dei Medici now allied himself with the great condottiere,
Francesco Sforza, and aided him with money to make good his claims upon
the Duchy of Milan. Henceforth this new alliance between Florence
and Milan, between the Medici and the Sforza, although most odious in
the eyes of the Florentine people, became one of the chief factors in
the balance of power in Italy. Soon afterwards Alfonso, the
Aragonese ruler of Naples, entered into this triple alliance; Venice and Rome
to some extent being regarded as a double alliance to counterbalance this.
To these foreign princes Cosimo was almost as much prince of Florence as they
of their dominions; and by what was practically a _coup d'etat_ in 1459,
Cosimo and his son Piero forcibly overthrew the last attempt of their
opponents to get the Signoria out of their hands, and, by means of the
creation of a new and permanent Council of a hundred of their chief
adherents, more firmly than ever secured their hold upon the
State.
[Illustration: FLORENCE IN THE DAYS OF LORENZO THE
MAGNIFICENT (_From an engraving, of about 1490, in the Berlin
Museum_)]
In his private life Cosimo was the simplest and most
unpretentious of tyrants, and lived the life of a wealthy merchant-burgher of
the day in its nobler aspects. He was an ideal father, a perfect man
of business, an apparently kindly fellow-citizen to all. Above all
things he loved the society of artists and men of letters; Brunelleschi
and Michelozzo, Donatello and Fra Lippo Lippi--to name only a few
more intimately connected with him--found in him the most generous
and discerning of patrons; many of the noblest Early Renaissance
churches and convents in Florence and its neighbourhood are due to
his munificence--San Lorenzo and San Marco and the Badia of Fiesole
are the most typical--and he even founded a hospital in Jerusalem. To
a certain extent this was what we should now call "conscience money." His
friend and biographer, Vespasiano Bisticci, writes: "He did these things
because it appeared to him that he held money, not over well acquired; and he
was wont to say that to God he had never given so much as to find Him on his
books a debtor. And likewise he said: I know the humours of this city; fifty
years will not pass before we are driven out; but the buildings will remain."
The Greeks, who came to the Council of Florence or fled from the in-coming
Turk, stimulated the study of their language and philosophy--though this had
really commenced in the days of the Republic, before the deaths of
Petrarch and Boccaccio--and found in Cosimo an ardent supporter. He
founded great libraries in San Marco and in the Badia of Fiesole, the
former with part of the codices collected by the scholar Niccolo
Niccoli; although he had banished the old Palla Strozzi, the true renovator
of the Florentine University, into hopeless exile. Into the
Neo-Platonism of the Renaissance Cosimo threw himself heart and soul. "To
Cosimo," writes Burckhardt, "belongs the special glory of recognising in
the Platonic philosophy the fairest flower of the ancient world
of thought, of inspiring his friends with the same belief, and thus
of fostering within humanistic circles themselves another and a
higher resuscitation of antiquity." In a youth of Figline, Marsilio
Ficino, the son of a doctor, Cosimo found a future high priest of this
new religion of love and beauty; and bidding him minister to the minds
of men rather than to their bodies, brought him into his palace, and
gave him a house in the city and a beautiful farm near Careggi. Thus
was founded the famous Platonic Academy, the centre of the richest Italian
thought of the century. As his end drew near, Cosimo turned to the
consolations of religion, and would pass long hours in his chosen cell in San
Marco, communing with the Dominican Archbishop, Antonino, and Fra Angelico,
the painter of mediæval Paradise. And with these thoughts, mingled with the
readings of Marsilio's growing translation of Plato, he passed away at his
villa at Careggi in 1464, on the first of August. Shortly before his death he
had lost his favourite son, Giovanni; and had been carried through his
palace, in the Via Larga, sighing that it was now too large a house for so
small a family. Entitled by public decree _Pater Patriae_, he was buried at
his own request without any pompous funeral, beneath a simple marble in
front of the high altar of San Lorenzo.
[Illustration: THE BADIA OF
FIESOLE]
Cosimo was succeeded, not without some opposition from rivals to
the Medici within their own party, by his son Piero. Piero's health was
in a shattered condition--il Gottoso, he was called--and for the most part
he lived in retirement at Careggi, occasionally carried into Florence in his
litter, leaving his brilliant young son Lorenzo to act as a more ornamental
figure-head for the State. The personal appearance of Piero is very different
to that of his father or son; in his portrait bust by Mino da Fiesole in the
Bargello, and in the picture by Bronzino in the National Gallery, there is
less craft and a certain air of frank and manly resolution. In his daring
move in support of Galeazzo Maria Sforza, when, on the death of Francesco,
it seemed for a moment that the Milanese dynasty was tottering, and
his promptness in crushing the formidable conspiracy of the
"mountain" against himself, Piero showed that sickness had not destroyed
his faculty of energetic action at the critical moment. He
completely followed out his father's policy, drawing still tighter the
bonds which united Florence with Milan and Naples, lavishing money on
the decoration of the city and the corruption of the people.
The opposition was headed by Luca Pitti, Agnolo Acciaiuoli,
Dietisalvi Neroni and others, who had been reckoned as Cosimo's friends, but
who were now intriguing with Venice and Ferrara to overthrow his
son. Hoping to eclipse the Medici in their own special field of
artistic display and wholesale corruption, Luca Pitti commenced that
enormous palace which still bears the name of his family, filled it with
bravos and refugees, resorted to all means fair or foul to get money to
build and corrupt. It seemed for a moment that the adherents of the
Mountain (as the opponents of the Medici were called, from this highly
situated Pitti Palace) and the adherents of the Plain (where the
comparatively modest Medicean palace--now the Palazzo Riccardi--stood in the
Via Larga) might renew the old factions of Blacks and Whites. But in
the late summer of 1466 the party of the Mountain was finally
crushed; they were punished with more mercy than the Medici generally
showed, and Luca Pitti was practically pardoned and left to a
dishonourable old age in the unfinished palace, which was in after years to
become the residence of the successors of his foes. About the same
time Filippo Strozzi and other exiles were allowed to return, and
another great palace began to rear its walls in the Via Tornabuoni, in
after years to be a centre of anti-Medicean intrigue.
The brilliancy
and splendour of Lorenzo's youth--he who was hereafter to be known in history
as the Magnificent--sheds a rich glow of colour round the closing months of
Piero's pain-haunted life. Piero himself had been content with a Florentine
wife, Lucrezia dei Tornabuoni, and he had married his daughters to Florentine
citizens, Guglielmo Pazzi and Bernardo Rucellai; but Lorenzo must make a
great foreign match, and was therefore given Clarice Orsini, the daughter of
a great Roman noble. The splendid pageant in the Piazza Santa Croce, and the
even more gorgeous marriage festivities in the palace in the Via
Larga, were followed by a triumphal progress of the young bridegroom
through Tuscany and the Riviera to Milan, to the court of that faithful
ally of his house, but most abominable monster, Giovanni Maria
Sforza. Piero died on December 3rd, 1469, and, like Cosimo, desired the
simple burial which his sons piously gave him. His plain but
beautiful monument designed by Verrocchio is in the older sacristy of
San Lorenzo, where he lies with his brother Giovanni.
"The second day
after his death," writes Lorenzo in his diary, "although I, Lorenzo, was very
young, in fact only in my twenty-first year, the leading men of the city and
of the ruling party came to our house to express their sorrow for our
misfortune, and to persuade me to take upon myself the charge of the
government of the city, as my grandfather and father had already done. This
proposal being contrary to the instincts of my age, and entailing great
labour and danger, I accepted against my will, and only for the sake of
protecting my friends, and our own fortunes, for in Florence one can ill live
in the possession of wealth without control of the
government."[17]
[17] From Mr Armstrong's _Lorenzo de'
Medici_.
These two youths, Lorenzo and Giuliano, were now, to all intents
and purposes, lords and masters of Florence. Lorenzo was the
ruling spirit; outwardly, in spite of his singularly harsh
and unprepossessing appearance, devoted to the cult of love and
beauty, delighting in sport and every kind of luxury, he was inwardly as
hard and cruel as tempered steel, and firmly fixed from the outset
upon developing the hardly defined prepotency of his house into a
complete personal despotism. You may see him as a gallant boy in
Benozzo Gozzoli's fresco in the palace of his father and grandfather,
riding under a bay tree, and crowned with roses; and then, in early
manhood, in Botticelli's famous Adoration of the Magi; and lastly, as a
fully developed, omniscient and all-embracing tyrant, in that truly
terrible picture by Vasari in the Uffizi, constructed out of
contemporary materials--surely as eloquent a sermon against the iniquity of
tyranny as the pages of Savonarola's _Reggimento di Firenze_. Giuliano was
a kindlier and gentler soul, completely given up to pleasure
and athletics; he lives for us still in many a picture from the hand
of Sandro Botticelli, sometimes directly portrayed, as in the
painting which Morelli bequeathed to Bergamo, more often idealised as Mars
or as Hermes; his love for the fair Simonetta inspired
Botticellian allegories and the most finished and courtly stanzas of
Poliziano. The sons of both these brothers were destined to sit upon the
throne of the Fisherman.
A long step in despotism was gained in 1470,
when the two great Councils of the People and the Commune were deprived of
all their functions, which were now invested in the thoroughly Medicean
Council of the Hundred. The next year Lorenzo's friend and ally,
Galeazzo Maria Sforza, with his Duchess and courtiers, came to Florence.
They were sumptuously received in the Medicean palace. The licence
and wantonness of these Milanese scandalised even the lax Florentines,
and largely added to the growing corruption of the city. The
accidental burning of Santo Spirito during the performance of a miracle play
was regarded as a certain sign of divine wrath. During his stay
in Florence the Duke, in contrast with whom the worst of the Medici
seems almost a saint, sat to one of the Pollaiuoli for the portrait
still seen in the Uffizi; by comparison with him even Lorenzo
looks charming; at the back of the picture there is a figure of
Charity--but the Duke has very appropriately driven it to the wall.
Unpopular though this Medicean-Sforza alliance was in Florence, it
was undoubtedly one of the safe-guards of the harmony
which, superficially, still existed between the five great powers of
Italy. When Galeazzo Maria met the fate he so richly deserved, and
was stabbed to death in the Church of San Stefano at Milan on December 20th,
1476, Pope Sixtus gave solemn utterance to the general dismay:_Oggi e morta la
pace d'Italia._ |
|
댓글 없음:
댓글 쓰기