2014년 11월 23일 일요일

The Ancient History of the Egyptians, Carthaginian 14

The Ancient History of the Egyptians, Carthaginian 14


After these expiations, expresses were despatched to Hamilcar in Sicily,

with the news of what had happened in Africa, and, at the same time, to

request immediate succours. He commanded the deputies to observe the

strictest silence on the subject of the victory of Agathocles; and spread

a contrary report, that he had been entirely defeated, his forces all cut

off, and his whole fleet taken by the Carthaginians; and, in confirmation

of this report, he showed the irons of the vessels pretended to be taken,

which had been carefully sent to him. The truth of this report was not at

all doubted in Syracuse; the majority were for capitulating;(647) when a

galley of thirty oars, built in haste by Agathocles, arrived in the port;

and through great difficulties and dangers forced its way to the besieged.

The news of Agathocles’s victory immediately flew through the city, and

restored alacrity and resolution to the inhabitants. Hamilcar made a last

effort to storm the city, but was beaten off with loss. He then raised the

siege, and sent five thousand men to the relief of his distressed country.

Some time after,(648) having resumed the siege, and hoping to surprise the

Syracusans by attacking them in the night, his design was discovered; and

falling alive into the enemy’s hands, he was put to death with the most

exquisite tortures.(649) Hamilcar’s head was sent immediately to

Agathocles, who, advancing to the enemy’s camp, threw it into a general

consternation, by displaying to them the head of this general, which

manifested the melancholy situation of their affairs in Sicily.

 

To these foreign enemies was joined a domestic one, which was more to be

feared, as being more dangerous than the others;(650) this was Bomilcar

their general, who was then in possession of the first post in Carthage.

He had long meditated the establishment of himself as tyrant at Carthage,

and attaining the sovereign authority there; and imagined that the present

troubles offered him the wished-for opportunity. He therefore entered the

city, and being seconded by a small number of citizens, who were the

accomplices of his rebellion, and a body of foreign soldiers, he

proclaimed himself tyrant; and showed himself literally such, by cutting

the throats of all the citizens whom he met with in the streets. A tumult

arising immediately in the city, it was at first thought that the enemy

had taken it by some treachery; but when it was known that Bomilcar caused

all this disturbance, the young men took up arms to repel the tyrant, and

from the tops of the houses discharged whole volleys of darts and stones

upon the heads of his soldiers. When he saw an army marching in order

against him, he retired with his troops to an eminence, with design to

make a vigorous defence, and to sell his life as dear as possible. To

spare the blood of the citizens, a general pardon was proclaimed for all

without exception who would lay down their arms. They surrendered upon

this proclamation, and all enjoyed the benefit of it, Bomilcar their chief

excepted: for the Carthaginians, without regarding their oath, condemned

him to death, and fastened him to a cross, where he suffered the most

exquisite torments. From the cross, as from a rostrum, he harangued the

people; and thought himself justly entitled to reproach them for their

injustice, their ingratitude, and perfidy, which he did by enumerating

many illustrious generals, whose services they had rewarded with an

ignominious death. He expired on the cross whilst uttering these

reproaches.(651)

 

Agathocles had won over to his interest a powerful king of Cyrene,(652)

named Ophellas, whose ambition he had flattered with the most splendid

hopes, by leading him to understand, that, contenting himself with Sicily,

he would leave to Ophellas the empire of Africa. But, as Agathocles did

not scruple to commit the most horrid crimes when he thought them

conducive to his interest, the credulous prince had no sooner put himself

and his army in his power, than, by the blackest perfidy, he caused him to

be murdered, in order that Ophellas’s army might be entirely at his

devotion. Many nations were now joined in alliance with Agathocles, and

several strongholds were garrisoned by his forces. As he now saw the

affairs of Africa in a flourishing condition, he thought it proper to look

after those of Sicily; accordingly he sailed back thither, having left the

command of the army to his son Archagathus. His renown, and the report of

his victories, flew before him. On the news of his arrival in Sicily many

towns revolted to him; but bad news soon recalled him to Africa. His

absence had quite changed the face of things; and all his endeavours were

incapable of restoring them to their former condition. All his

strong-holds had surrendered to the enemy; the Africans had deserted him;

some of his troops were lost, and the remainder were unable to make head

against the Carthaginians; he had no way to transport them into Sicily, as

he was destitute of ships, and the enemy were masters at sea: he could not

hope for either peace or treaty with the barbarians, since he had insulted

them in so outrageous a manner, by his being the first who had dared to

make a descent in their country. In this extremity, he thought only of

providing for his own safety. After many adventures, this base deserter of

his army, and perfidious betrayer of his own children, who were left by

him to the wild fury of his disappointed soldiers, stole away from the

dangers which threatened him, and arrived at Syracuse with very few

followers. His soldiers, seeing themselves thus betrayed, murdered his

sons, and surrendered to the enemy. Himself died miserably soon after, and

ended, by a cruel death,(653) a life that had been polluted with the

blackest crimes.

 

In this period may be placed another incident related by Justin.(654) The

fame of Alexander’s conquests made the Carthaginians fear, that he might

think of turning his arms towards Africa. The disastrous fate of Tyre,

whence they drew their origin, and which he had so lately destroyed; the

building of Alexandria upon the confines of Africa and Egypt, as if he

intended it as a rival city to Carthage; the uninterrupted successes of

that prince, whose ambition and good fortune were boundless; all this

justly alarmed the Carthaginians. To sound his inclinations, Hamilcar,

surnamed Rhodanus, pretending to have been driven from his country by the

cabals of his enemies, went over to the camp of Alexander, to whom he was

introduced by Parmenio, and offered him his services. The king received

him graciously, and had several conferences with him. Hamilcar did not

fail to transmit to his country whatever discoveries he made from time to

time of Alexander’s designs. Nevertheless, on his return to Carthage,

after Alexander’s death, he was considered as a betrayer of his country to

that prince; and accordingly was put to death, by a sentence which

displayed equally the ingratitude and cruelty of his countrymen.

 

(M105) I am now to speak of the wars of the Carthaginians in Sicily, in

the time of Pyrrhus, king of Epirus.(655) The Romans, to whom the designs

of that ambitious prince were not unknown, in order to strengthen

themselves against any attempts he might make upon Italy, had renewed

their treaties with the Carthaginians, who, on their side, were no less

afraid of his crossing into Sicily. To the articles of the preceding

treaties, there was added an engagement of mutual assistance, in case

either of the contracting powers should be attacked by Pyrrhus.

 

The foresight of the Romans was well founded: Pyrrhus turned his arms

against Italy, and gained many victories.(656) The Carthaginians, in

consequence of the last treaty, thought themselves obliged to assist the

Romans; and accordingly sent them a fleet of six-score sail, under the

command of Mago. This general, in an audience before the senate, signified

to them the interest which his superiors took in the war which they heard

was carrying on against the Romans, and offered them their assistance. The

senate returned thanks for the obliging offer of the Carthaginians, but at

present thought fit to decline it.

 

Mago,(657) some days after, repaired to Pyrrhus, upon pretence of offering

the mediation of Carthage for terminating his quarrel with the Romans; but

in reality to sound him, and discover, if possible, his designs with

regard to Sicily, which common fame reported he was going to invade. The

Carthaginians were afraid that either Pyrrhus or the Romans would

interfere in the affairs of that island, and transport forces thither for

the conquest of it. And, indeed, the Syracusans, who had been besieged for

some time by the Carthaginians, had sent pressingly for succour to

Pyrrhus. This prince had a particular reason to espouse their interests,

having married Lanassa, daughter of Agathocles, by whom he had a son named

Alexander. He at last sailed from Tarentum, passed the Strait, and arrived

in Sicily. His conquests at first were so rapid, that he left the

Carthaginians, in the whole island, only the single town of Lilybæum. He

laid siege to it, but meeting with a vigorous resistance, was obliged to

raise the siege; not to mention that the urgent necessity of his affairs

called him back to Italy, where his presence was absolutely necessary. Nor

was it less so in Sicily, which, on his departure, returned to the

obedience of its former masters. Thus he lost this island with the same

rapidity that he had won it. As he was embarking, he turned his eyes back

to Sicily, and exclaimed to those about him,(658) “What a fine field of

battle(659) do we leave the Carthaginians and Romans!” His prediction was

soon verified.

 

After his departure, the chief magistracy of Syracuse was conferred on

Hiero, who afterwards obtained the name and dignity of king, by the united

suffrages of the citizens; so greatly had his government pleased. He was

appointed to carry on the war against the Carthaginians, and obtained

several advantages over them. But now a common interest reunited them

against a new enemy, who began to appear in Sicily, and justly alarmed

both: these were the Romans, who, having crushed all the enemies which had

hitherto exercised their arms in Italy itself, were now powerful enough to

carry them out of it; and to lay the foundation of that vast power there

to which they afterwards attained, and of which it was probable they had

even then formed the design. Sicily lay too commodious for them, not to

form a resolution of establishing themselves in it. They therefore eagerly

snatched this opportunity for crossing into it, which caused the rupture

between them and the Carthaginians, and gave rise to the first Punic war.

This I shall treat of more at large, by relating the causes of that war.

 

 

 

Chapter II. The History of Carthage from the first Punic War to its

destruction.

 

 

The plan which I have laid down does not allow me to enter into an exact

detail of the wars between Rome and Carthage; since that pertains rather

to the Roman history, which I do not intend to touch upon, except

transiently and occasionally. I shall therefore relate such facts only as

may give the reader a just idea of the republic whose history lies before

me; by confining myself to those particulars which relate chiefly to the

Carthaginians, and to their most important transactions in Sicily, Spain,

and Africa: a subject in itself sufficiently extensive.

 

I have already observed, that from the first Punic war to the ruin of

Carthage, a hundred and eighteen years elapsed. This whole time may be

divided into five parts or intervals.

 

I. The first Punic war lasted twenty-four years.

 

II. The interval betwixt the first and second Punic war is also

twenty-four years.

 

III. The second Punic war took up seventeen years.

 

IV. The interval between the second and third is forty-nine years.

 

V. The third Punic war, terminated by the destruction of Carthage,

continued but four years and some months.

 

Total: 118 years.

 

(M106) ARTICLE I. THE FIRST PUNIC WAR.The first Punic war arose from the

following cause. Some Campanian soldiers, in the service of Agathocles,

the Sicilian tyrant, having entered as friends into Messina, soon after

murdered part of the townsmen, drove out the rest, married their wives,

seized their effects, and remained sole masters of that important

city.(660) They then assumed the name of Mamertines. In imitation of them,

and by their assistance, a Roman legion treated in the same cruel manner

the city of Rhegium, lying directly opposite to Messina, on the other side

of the strait. These two perfidious cities, supporting one another,

rendered themselves at length formidable to their neighbours; and

especially Messina, which became very powerful, and gave great umbrage and

uneasiness both to the Syracusans and Carthaginians, who possessed one

part of Sicily. As soon as the Romans had got rid of the enemies they had

so long contended with, and particularly of Pyrrhus, they began to think

of punishing the crime of their citizens, who had settled themselves at

Rhegium, in so cruel and treacherous a manner, nearly ten years before.

Accordingly, they took the city, and killed, in the attack, the greatest

part of the inhabitants, who, instigated by despair, had fought to the

last gasp: three hundred only were left, who were carried to Rome,

whipped, and then publicly beheaded in the forum. The view which the

Romans had in making this bloody execution, was, to prove to their allies

their own sincerity and innocence. Rhegium was immediately restored to its

lawful possessors. The Mamertines, who were considerably weakened, as well

by the ruin of their confederate city, as by the losses which they had

sustained from the Syracusans, who had lately placed Hiero at their head,

thought it time to provide for their own safety. But divisions arising

among them, one part surrendered the citadel to the Carthaginians, whilst

the other called in the Romans to their assistance, and resolved to put

them in possession of their city.

 

The affair was debated in the Roman senate, where, being considered in all

its lights, it appeared to have some difficulties.(661) On one hand, it

was thought base, and altogether unworthy of the Roman virtue, for them to

undertake openly the defence of traitors, whose perfidy was exactly the

same with that of the Rhegians, whom the Romans had recently punished with

so exemplary a severity. On the other hand, it was of the utmost

consequence to stop the progress of the Carthaginians, who, not satisfied

with their conquests in Africa and Spain, had also made themselves masters

of almost all the islands of the Sardinian and Hetrurian seas; and would

certainly get all Sicily into their hands, if they should be suffered to

possess themselves of Messina. From thence into Italy, the passage was

very short; and it was in some manner to invite an enemy to come over, to

leave the entrance open. These reasons, though so strong, could not

prevail with the senate to declare in favour of the Mamertines; and

accordingly, motives of honour and justice prevailed in this instance over

those of interest and policy. (M107) But the people were not so

scrupulous; for, in an assembly held on this subject, it was resolved that

the Mamertines should be assisted.(662) The consul Appius Claudius

댓글 없음: