2015년 8월 3일 월요일

Indian Tribes of the Upper Missouri 22

Indian Tribes of the Upper Missouri 22


Also their zeal in this induces them to interfere with the present
government, domestic arrangements, and superstitions of the grown
Indians, thereby incurring their enmity, disgust, or revenge. The
present grown-up generation should be left entirely alone, not
interfered with, no attempt made to convert them, or even induce them
to work. It is useless, inexpedient, and subverts the general ends.
The first thing a missionary does is to abuse the Indian for having a
plurality of wives.
 
[16] Here Denig mildly protests against the unreasonable emphasis
placed on the observance of religious rites by the missionaries to the
exclusion of other duties.
 
Would the good missionary be so charitable as to clothe, feed, and
shelter the supernumerary woman; should all the Indians follow his
advice and have but one wife? Will the Indian consent to separate his
children from their mothers, or to turn both adrift to please the
whim of any man? This advice is uncharitable, unjust, and can only be
excused on the plea of ignorance of their customs and feeling. The
next difference that arises is that the priests take away all their
charms, medicines, and idols, and present them their cross instead.
Now as far as any of these old Indian reprobates can conceive the
idea of the cross, it is nothing more than a different kind of idol
in exchange for theirs. What in the name of common sense could induce
old priests, in every other respect sane and well informed, to think
that by administering baptism and giving an Indian the symbol of the
cross they have thus converted them, we can not imagine. If the Indians
believe anything thereby, it is that the image or medal possesses
some intrinsic supernatural power to prevent them from personal harm
or give them success in war, known to be efficacious by the whites,
and is to them in fact nothing more than a different kind of medicine
bird or medicine ball. Can they (the priests) suppose that an Indian,
only a grade above the level of the brute in intelligence, could
without education form a correct idea of the ordinance of Baptism,
the Incarnation, the Trinity, the Crucifixion and Atonement and other
abstruse points in which even whites, with all their education, can not
agree?
 
These grown Indians are too ignorant and obstinate to think, too lazy
to work, too proud to be instructed, and their formed habits too savage
and firmly rooted to give way before the meek truths of the gospel.
All such attempts must prove abortive; it is anticipating by an age
what should be their present course among the children. We would say
let all the grown generation die as they have lived, though before that
event took place many of them would have the satisfaction of seeing
their children in comparatively happy and improved conditions. This is
the only right beginning. Bring them up in the proper way, impressing
moral truths and industrious habits when young and fostering the same
in maturity. The Government can do this, should do it, and would be
extending a charity to a part of the human race but few sympathize
with, and opening a way for the remnant of aborigines to become a
useful and intelligent people. We repeat it, there are no objections
to this among the Indians. Proffers of the kind would be readily
acceded to by any tribe, even the Blackfeet, and all sensible traders
would assist. It would not benefit them, might perhaps hurt their
business some, and would in the end lead to its discontinuance. But
this is of minor consideration. We are confident that establishments
on the principles we have suggested would succeed and answer great
ends. But they must begin with the children as their foundation, not
merely for the observances of religious duties, without combining
active agricultural and pastoral pursuits, with a judicious choice of
mechanical arts.
 
It does not follow that the Indians should abandon their hunting
altogether to accomplish these ends. Those who wished to hunt could
still do so, as they now do at Red River, and when hunting failed,
as it eventually must when white emigration settles the country, the
Indians would find themselves in a position to live fully if not more
comfortably than before. Some of the money of the United States could
not be applied to a better purpose. One-half of the amount Congress
expends on the repairs of some old bridge would be sufficient to rear
and educate several hundred children. Indeed, after the boys and
girls had attained the age of 12 to 15 years they could more than
support themselves by their labor. Abstruse studies or extensive
mental acquirements should not be striven for except with the view of
providing teachers or physicians of their own nation, but generally
the rudiments of English education, such as is taught the peasantry
of England, would answer better. Too much education would produce an
unwillingness if not an inability to work.
 
Physicians of their own people would tend more to banish their
superstitions and encourage these institutions than all the preaching
in the world. Correct medical knowledge would be apparent in its
effects, and be the greatest acquirement in the eyes of the Indian.
 
With its introduction would disappear the host of jugglers, conjurers,
medicine men, and humbugs that now impoverish and kill most of their
patients. A distinct idea of crime and the necessity of law would
follow. The democratic principles of government already implanted would
assume an effective form and civilization and Christianity would be the
result. To accomplish this present payments of annuities should not be
curtailed, as it would hazard the ill feelings of the grown Indians
who, seeing no immediate benefit arising, would become dissatisfied
with the appropriation of their funds. Separate appropriations or funds
could be raised for the purpose.
 
 
WARFARE
 
The usual cause of war among the prairie tribes is the stealing of
horses. Indians must have horses, can not well live without them, and
will risk everything to obtain them. Moreover, horses are looked upon
in a measure as public property; that is, those nations who have few
think they have a right to take them from those who have many. Whether
it is a right or not they do it, and in these expeditions frequently
men are killed on both sides. This produces an obligation on the part
of the relatives of the deceased to revenge their deaths, and war
continues with various successes on both sides. The occupation of war
is also the most honorable an Indian can follow. The young men are not
noticed, neither can they aspire to the hand of a respectable young
woman, without having distinguished themselves in war excursions. They
are taught this when young, and as things now stand, it is difficult to
change. Nevertheless it can be done. Not immediately, but in the course
of a few years. There is always an opening to the heart of the Indian
through his love of gain. Most chiefs, soldiers, and heads of families
are open to bribes. The object of war in the first place is gain, and
the dangers attending it make it honorable.
 
This object (gain) must be superseded by an equivalent and the idea of
honor transferred to other sources. Take, for instance, the Blackfeet,
who are the most numerous and bloodthirsty nation on the upper
Missouri. Assemble them in treaty and make a distribution of $25,000
or $30,000 in merchandise among them and the deputations of other
nations with whom a peace is to be concluded. How would this operate?
The soldiers of the camp who would be appointed to distribute this
merchandise are the most powerful party, have generally the raising and
leading of war parties, and would take a liberal share of the presents
for themselves. The chiefs and heads of families would also receive a
large amount and the rest be divided among the young men, warriors,
women, etc. The peace would be made, all would be satisfied for the
present; but unless these payments were continued for a number of
years, or until the benefits of peace were realized and acknowledged,
nothing would be gained. An Indian does not reflect upon what he has
received but what is yet in store for him. The prospects of an annual
repetition of these presents would induce them to keep the treaty
stipulations. Why and how? The soldiers, chiefs, and heads of families,
whose voices only could make war, are held in check by the prospects
of gain, and should any parties be raised would be paid to stop, or if
they continued and stole horses, or killed a few of the nation with
whom peace had been made, the affair would be paid for and hushed up on
both sides, on account of the coming presents.
 
The reason why persons killed in time of peace between two nations
can be paid for, and privately not, is that in the former case the
voices of all, except the immediate relations of the slain, are against
revenge, inasmuch as it would affect their interests with regard to the
presents granted by the treaty. This operation going on in both nations
at the same time leaves the relatives too few to effect a revenge, and
the dishonor is evaded by the compulsion. In the course of a few years
all old causes for revenge would be forgotten. By visiting each other
and exchanging property, horses (the usual cause of war) would become
more equally divided, by being bought by those who wish them, instead
of stolen. Acquaintance with each other’s language, intermarriages, and
other ties would follow, and the advantage of receiving a large supply
of merchandise without the labor of hunting skins for it, together
with the honor and increase of power of the soldiers, by having the
distribution of this merchandise, must effectually throw the popular
voice against war. The voices of the women, though not consulted,
would be felt. They are vain, fond of dress, and would, of course, be
in favor of the treaty which enables them to gratify this passion in
a greater degree by furnishing them with clothing gratis. Therefore
war would be discontinued by them, and the hand of a peaceable man
preferred to one whose conduct militated against their own interests
and those of their parents. For we apprehend that the favor warriors
find in the eyes of the women and their parents is the result of their
success, not the glory in their bravery.
 
It is the horses stolen from their enemies that gives them wealth to
purchase any woman they please, and the father-in-law is anxious to
have a son-in-law who can at any time replace his loss in horses.
Indians are poor; that is, they are always in need of articles they
can not purchase, and getting a supply gratis is of great advantage to
them. The power of these annuities is great, and could be wielded with sufficient force to bring different bands to war upon their own people, and compel them to preserve the treaty stipulations.

댓글 없음: