Owing to its geographical position Corinth was frequently the
scene of conference between different Greek states. In 337 B.C. a
general congress was summoned by Philip for the purpose of obtaining approval
of his scheme for the invasion of Persia in his new role as the head
of Greece. The desired assent was given (Sparta alone withholding it),
but the scheme was never carried out, owing to the assassination of
Philip by an aggrieved member of his bodyguard. In the midst of
splendid festivities to celebrate his daughter’s marriage to the King of
Epirus and the birth of a son to himself by his new wife, the exultant
king, clothed in white, was about to enter the crowded theatre at the end of
a solemn procession, in which statues of the twelve great divinities
of Olympus were followed by an image of himself--when, suddenly, the
fatal blow was struck that put an end for ever to his hope of
further conquest. Within two months after the death of his father, Alexander
was marching with an army through Greece, and at another congress held
in Corinth he had the same honours voted to him as his father had
received. The following year (335 B.C.) Alexander was again at Corinth,
seeing Greece for the last time, although he was only twenty-one years old.
It was on this occasion that he was so taken with the
amazing self-sufficiency of the cynical philosopher who had nothing better
to ask of the young potentate, when he was honoured with a visit, than
to request him to stand out of his sunshine. “If I were not
Alexander,” exclaimed the monarch, “I would be Diogenes.”
At a later
time Corinth played a prominent part in connection with the Achæan League.
The story of the capture of Acro-Corinthus from the Macedonians by Aratus on
a moonlit night, so graphically told by Plutarch, is one of the most
interesting passages in any of his biographies. A hundred years afterwards
(146 B.C.) the forwardness of Corinth in an attempt to throw off the Roman
yoke led to its complete destruction and depopulation by the Roman consul, L.
Mummius. In the next century, however, Julius Cæsar saw the vast capabilities
of the site, and planted on it a Roman colony, which led to such a
development of trade that in the first century of the Christian era it was
again one of the most flourishing cities of Greece.
Of its wealth and
magnificence very slight traces now remain. The most imposing ruin is that of
a Dorian temple of Apollo, dating from the sixth or seventh century B.C.
Seven of its columns, with a portion of the architrave, have braved the storm
for 2600 years and escaped the hand of the destroyer. These monoliths, about
23½ feet high and fully 5½ feet thick, tapering upwards, form a most
impressive monument. Two other columns have recently been
discovered
[Illustration: THE TEMPLE OF ATHENA AT SUNIUM (CAPE COLONNA)
FROM THE NORTH
An encampment on the site of the _cella_ of the
Temple.]
below ground by the American School of Archæology, to which we
are also indebted for the identification of the fountain of Glauke,
already mentioned, and that of the lower Peirene, with the masonry
surrounding them. Marble propylæa, leading to the market-place, and a theatre
have also been uncovered. On the top of Acro-Corinthus there was a temple
of Aphrodite, with a ritual borrowed from that of the Phœnician
Astarte, but scarcely any trace of it has been discovered, the remains
being principally those of fortifications, including some of such a
primitive and massive construction that the name of Cyclopean may be applied
to them.
Scarcely anywhere do we find any sign of the “Corinthian”
column, though the _acanthus_ or thistle, which is said to have suggested
that style of decoration to Callimachus, may frequently be seen in the bare
and arid plain which forms the southern part of the isthmus. According
to Vitruvius, the Latin writer on architecture, the idea occurred
to Callimachus on seeing the acanthus growing over a basket which had
been placed by her old nurse on the grave of a young lady who had died on
the eve of her marriage. In the basket were deposited a number of
little things which had been dear to the lady in her childhood, and on the
top the nurse had placed a square flat tile to keep out the rain. When
the spring came round, a hidden acanthus root put forth its leaves,
which crept up the sides of the basket and coiled round the corners of
the tile like volutes; and it was in imitation of the beautiful
appearance thus presented that Callimachus designed the style of capital
which afterwards became famous as the Corinthian order.
Northward from
the propylæa the road leads to the harbour of Lechæum, about a mile and a
half distant, and alongside of it traces of the two long walls can still be
seen. The harbour is now a lagoon, and that on the eastern side of the
isthmus at Cenchreæ is also desolate--a state of things which contrasts sadly
with what might have been seen as early as 700 B.C., when Corinth was famous
for its shipping, and had just built four triremes (full-deckers, with triple
banks of oars) for the people of Samos, who had never possessed such ships
before. To many minds, however, Cenchreæ suggests other thoughts, for it was
there that Phœbe, the prototype of Christian deaconesses, dwelt, whom St.
Paul commended to the Christians at Rome as “our sister, which is a
servant of the church which is at Cenchreæ.” Another thing that reminds us
of St. Paul is a fragment of marble in the local museum bearing the
letters ... αγωγη εβ ..., the original having evidently been συναγωγη
εβραιων, recalling the fact mentioned in the Acts of the Apostles that Paul
spent a year and a half in Corinth with Aquila and Priscilla, in a
house adjoining the synagogue. At the little railway station of New Corinth
we had a proof how much more lasting may be the influence of the pen
than of the sword when we were offered a copy of the New Testament in
Greek, issued by the British and Foreign Bible Society. New Corinth lies to
the north-west of the ancient city, not very far from the Lechæan
harbour. It is a well-built little town of about 4000 inhabitants, and
was founded fifty years ago, when the old town was destroyed by
an earthquake--the third time that such a calamity had happened to
it during the Christian era. At no great distance are the traces of
the walls by which the Peloponnesian states at various periods attempted
to secure themselves against invasion from the north. Some remains
have also been found of the _diolkos_ or tramway, running across
the narrowest and lowest part of the isthmus, by which it was customary
to transport not only the freight of vessels but the vessels
themselves, while the passengers frequently walked across to the port on the
other side.
The idea of cutting a canal is said to date as far back as
the reign of Periander, already mentioned, who was accounted one of the Seven
Wise Men of Greece. It was entertained by Demetrius Poliorcetes and
Julius Cæsar, but Nero was the first to make any serious attempt to carry
it out. “A great multitude of soldiers and prisoners, including
apparently 6000 Jews sent by Vespasian from Judæa, were assembled at the
isthmus, and operations were begun with much solemnity, apparently about the
end of 67 A.D. The emperor himself, after chanting hymns in honour of
the marine deities, set the example by giving a few strokes with a
golden pickaxe, which the governor of Greece formally handed to him. Then
the multitude fell to work in earnest, the soldiers turning up the
earth, and the prisoners hewing at the rocks. A beginning was made on
the western side of the isthmus, but excavations had been carried for
a distance of only about four furlongs when they were suddenly
suspended in consequence of evil tidings which Nero received of conspiracies
at Rome and disaffection among the armies of the West.”[4]
The modern
canal, which was undertaken by a French Company in 1881, was completed by a
Greek Company in 1893. To one sailing through it has a much more striking
appearance than the Suez Canal, owing to the height of its banks on either
side, for the most part cut out of sandy or alluvial soil, and rising like
walls to a height of more than 100 feet. At one point the railway passes over
it at a height of about 170 feet above the water. The canal is about three
and a half miles long. It reduces the voyage from the Ionian Islands to
Athens to about half the distance involved in sailing round Cape Matapan, but
unfortunately it is too narrow (only about 75 feet wide) to be of much use
for the larger ships. As a rule it is only the Greek coasting vessels that
take advantage of it, and there is little or no prospect of its ever
becoming one of the great highways to the East.
Not far from the
eastern end of the canal is the precinct that was sacred to Poseidon, where
the Isthmian Games were held every second year. The stadium can still be
traced, memorable, among other things, as the scene of the inauguration of
Alexander the Great as the acknowledged prince of Greece, and of the
proclamation of liberty to the Greeks, one hundred and forty
years
[Illustration: OFF CAPE MATAPAN, SOUTHERN GREECE
Sketch from
the Messageries steamer _Nerthe_.]
afterwards, by the Roman Consul
Flamininus. A little way south, on a plateau about 300 feet high, are
extensive remains of a city built out of the rock, which may have been the
prehistoric city of the isthmus, referred to by Homer as “wealthy Ephyra.”
Some twenty miles to the south-west, on the way to Mycenæ, lies the secluded
vale of Nemea, where games were also celebrated every second year,
consecrated by the erection of a temple of Zeus, of which a number of
beautiful columns are still standing, while others lie prostrate on the
ground. It was in this woody district that the lion which Heracles slew, as
the first of the Twelve Labours imposed upon him by Eurysthenes, was supposed
to have had his lair.
CHAPTER VIII
ATHENS AND ITS
ACROPOLIS
Nowhere in Greece, nowhere perhaps in the ancient world,
were the geographical conditions more favourable to the growth of a
genial, intelligent, and energetic community than in Athens. The sky was
bright, the air pure, and the climate temperate. The soil, while not so rich
as to demoralise the inhabitants or to offer much inducement to an
invader, yielded its cultivators the means of subsistence in the form of
figs, olives, corn, and wine. At the same time the city enjoyed the
advantage of easy communication with other countries both by land and sea,
being situated on a plain which formed part of the continent of Europe,
and having on its projecting coast three safe and commodious harbours,
which gave it facilities for traffic in many different directions. For
the purpose of defence, its Acropolis, facing the sea a few miles off,
and backed at a considerable distance by a well-defined mountain
frontier, provided it with a natural stronghold in case of attack.
The
Acropolis is only one of a number of heights
[Illustration: THE WESTERN
END OF THE ACROPOLIS SEEN FROM BELOW THE PNYX
The position of the
Propylæa, the magnificent gatehouse of Pentelic marble designed by the
architect Mnesicles, is admirably shown in this drawing. All the five
doorways, which were closed by doors of bronze, are seen against the sky.
Immediately to the left is the north wing (the Pinacotheca); to the right the
bastion surmounted by the little Nike Temple. High above all rises the
Parthenon. Coming down to the foreground, we may note, on the right, the
great supporting wall of the Theatre of Herodes Atticus with the blue
Hymettos behind it; and, to the left, the pinkish coloured rock of the
Areopagus, with Lycabettos above.]
rising out of the plain in the
neighbourhood of Athens, including Lycabettus, Areopagus, Pnyx, and Museum
Hill. Though not nearly so high as Lycabettus, the Acropolis was better
fitted for defence, as it was almost inaccessible from all sides except the
west, and had a flat summit of considerable extent. In itself it is not equal
to the Castle Rock of “modern Athens,” being only 150 feet high, 1150 long,
and about 500 in breadth. But it is a far more striking object from many
points of view, partly owing to its position on a rising ground, partly
because it is crowned with the noble ruins of the Parthenon. Many traces
still remain of its original fortifications, which were of a
Cyclopean character, and were attributed to the Pelasgian race. This name,
indeed, survives in the Pelasgicon (otherwise called Pelargicon), an
elaborate outwork consisting of a series of terraced battlements with nine
gates (Enneapylon), of which some remains can still be made out. On
the eastern side there can also be seen the lower courses of a wall
which had been built to fill up a depression in the hill.
Although
Attica is not much more than half the size of Cornwall, there was a time when
its inhabitants were divided into many different communities, practically
independent of each other. The city of Athens was then confined to the
Acropolis and a small extent of ground in its immediate neighbourhood on the
south-east. According to tradition it was Theseus who welded together the
various demes or townships into one organised community under his single
rule; and in commemoration of this rare achievement in Greek history the
festival of Synœcia long continued to be celebrated. Theseus is mentioned
both in the _Iliad_ and the _Odyssey_, and his two sons fought in the Trojan
war, yet it was not he but his successor Menestheus who commanded the
Athenian forces in the war, owing to certain impieties committed by him which
entailed upon him the loss of his crown. No hero was credited with more
wonderful performances than Theseus both by land and sea, and even in
the underground world, though his efforts there were not so successful.
His most memorable exploit in the eyes of the Athenians was the
destruction of the Minotaur, a monster with the body of a man and the head of
a bull, which was kept at Knossus, the capital of the Cretan empire
of Minos, and to which Athens had to devote a sacrifice of seven youths
and seven maidens every nine years. When the time came round
Theseus volunteered to accompany the victims, in order to deliver them; and
with the help of Ariadne, the king’s daughter, who furnished him with a
clue to the labyrinth in which the monster was confined and a sword,
he succeeded in his perilous mission, and brought back his young
companions safe and sound. He had arranged with his father Ægeus that in that
event he would hoist a white sail instead of the usual black one;
but unfortunately he omitted to give the sign, and the aged king, who
was looking out from the Acropolis, where the temple of Nike now
stands, being overcome with grief at the apparent failure of his son’s
heroic undertaking, threw himself down among the rocks and perished.
According to another version of the story, he was waiting on the shore and
threw himself into the sea. To commemorate the event embodied in
this tradition the Athenians were in the habit of sending a ship to
Delos every year to offer to Apollo a sacrifice of a less distressing
nature. During the month in which this took place, no public act was
permitted that was considered to be out of keeping with it, such as the
execution of a criminal; and it was owing to this that Socrates was so
long confined in prison after sentence of death had been passed upon
him.
Theseus was believed to have given the Athenians his countenance and
aid at the battle of Marathon, and a few years afterwards they
were commanded by the Delphian oracle to bring back his bones from the
island of Scyros, where he had met a violent death. The injunction was
obeyed in 469 B.C. by Cimon, the son of Miltiades, who discovered a
gigantic skeleton, and brought it to Athens amid great rejoicing. It was
then reinterred in a sanctuary devoted to Theseus’ memory, which is
often mentioned by subsequent Greek writers, and afforded a refuge within
its spacious precincts to the poor and oppressed, whether bond or free,
who felt themselves to be in danger. Unfortunately the historical
references to this sanctuary, as well as the fact that it was in honour of a
hero, not of a god, forbid us to identify it with the noble Doric
temple standing between the Areopagus and the Agora or Market-place, which
is now commonly known as the Theseum. The probability is that the
latter building was a temple in honour of Hephæstus or of Hephæstus
and Athena. It is built of white Pentelic marble, with thirty-four
columns in all, the sculptures on it being of Parian marble, and is second
only to the Parthenon in majestic beauty. Traces of the bright red and
blue colouring, which was used even in the decoration of marble, can
be distinctly seen; and part of the coffered roof is still in
position, adorned with painted stars. During the Middle Ages it was turned
into a church dedicated to St. George, and it is doubtless owing to this
cause that it still survives in such an excellent state of
preservation.
For centuries before the time of Theseus the Acropolis had
been the seat of a civilisation not much inferior to that of Mycenæ. Homer
speaks of a “well-built house of Erectheus” to which Athena used to repair;
and on the Acropolis, under what is believed to have been the earliest
temple of Athena, part of the foundations of a palace, apparently similar
in plan to those of Mycenæ and Tiryns, has been discovered.
The fortifications, too, are very similar, and there is a long
inner staircase leading to a postern in the northern wall that corresponds
to those found in the ancient structures referred to. There is
another prehistoric name with which tradition connects the primitive history
of Athens, and on account of which it was sometimes called
Cecropia. According to some, Cecrops came from Egypt; according to others he
was autochthonous (as the Athenians claimed to be), and had the
appearance of being half man and half serpent.
[Illustration: THE
TEMPLE OF THESEUS FROM THE SOUTH-WEST
The mountain dominating the Temple,
to the right (east), is Lycabettos; the distant mountain to the left is
Pentelikon.]
Amid these conflicting mythical traditions it was generally
agreed that the last king of Athens was Codrus, who was said to be a
descendant of Ion, the head of the Ionic branch of the Hellenic race, the
latter name being derived from Hellen, the grandfather of Ion. When the
Dorians invaded Attica, after taking possession of the Peloponnesus, they
were informed by a Pythian oracle that if the life of Codrus were spared
they would gain possession of the country. Codrus became aware of this,
and in order to save his country he went out one day in disguise
and provoked a quarrel with some of the enemy, who put him to death. As
soon as this became known to the Dorians they abandoned the hope of
conquest, and contented themselves with annexing Megara. By a strange process
of reasoning the grateful subjects of the self-sacrificing king
straightway abolished the monarchy, on the ground that it would be impossible
to find any one worthy to sit on the throne of so noble a sovereign!
The name of Codrus was not the only name in the early history of Athens
that was associated with patriotic self-devotion. Long before, one of
the three daughters of Cecrops, Agraulos, was said to have leapt from
the Acropolis as a voluntary sacrifice, when it was declared by the
oracle that there was no other means of bringing a war which had been
long going on to a successful issue. Her name was given to a grotto on
the north, near the spot on which she met her death; and it was there
that the Athenian youth, when they reached manhood, offered sacrifice
and swore to be faithful to their country even unto death.
After the
death of Codrus the office of archon was instituted as an office for life,
tenable by the leading member of the royal family. The late king’s two sons,
Medon and Neileus, quarrelled about the succession, and the latter emigrated
with a large portion of the population to Asia Minor, where he founded the
Ionic Amphictyony of twelve cities, extending from Miletus to Phocæa. For
about 300 years the archonship continued to be held for life; but after that
the tenure of office was changed to ten years, and at a still later period it
became an annual appointment, and was thrown open to the eupatrids or
nobles. Ultimately it became a collegiate charge, being held by nine
men simultaneously, who divided the functions of government among
them.
Towards the end of the seventh century B.C. a legislator came upon
the scene in the person of Draco, whose name has become a synonym
for severity, though it would seem that what he did was to codify
existing laws and customs rather than to introduce new regulations. Even at
an earlier period laws had been reduced to writing among the
Epizephyrian Locrians of Italy by Zaleucus at the bidding of the Delphian
oracle, for the purpose of restoring order in the state. The system adopted
was of the nature of the _lex talionis_. Severe measures were doubtless
needed, for it was these Locrians who got the better of the natives by taking
a mutual oath with them to the effect that the two peoples should
be allowed to enjoy the land in common, so long as they stood upon
this earth (such were the terms of the oath) and had heads on
their
[Illustration: THE TEMPLE OF THESEUS FROM THE NORTH-WEST (MORNING
LIGHT)
This drawing shows very well the seating of the Temple on its
site, Kolonos Agoraios--the Market Hill.]
shoulders. In order that
they might be able to destroy the validity of the covenant, they had put
earth into their shoes and concealed heads of garlic on their shoulders,
believing that as soon as these things were removed the oath would lose its
binding force. In order to discourage rash attempts at legislation the same
people enacted that any one proposing a new law should appear before the
assembly with a rope round his neck, which was to be immediately tightened if
he failed to get his proposal adopted!
About this time an attempt was
made by Cylon, a wealthy and distinguished citizen of Athens, to obtain
supreme power, with the help of his father-in-law, the ruler of Megara. He
succeeded in taking possession of the Acropolis, but the citizens rose
against him and compelled him to flee the country. His followers, who were
left in the citadel, took refuge in the temple of Athena, but they were
induced to quit the sanctuary by a promise that their lives would be spared.
As an additional security, however, they fastened a cord to the image of
the goddess and kept hold of it as they withdrew from the
Acropolis. Unfortunately the cord broke before they had gained a place of
safety; and the citizens, regarding this as a token that Athena had deserted
the fugitives, attacked and slew them. The outrage was aggravated by
the fact that some of them were put to death in the sanctuary of
the Eumenides at the side of the Areopagus. The archon who was
chiefly responsible for the perfidious and profane slaughter was Megacles,
the head of the Alcmæonid family, which was in consequence regarded
as polluted. A pestilence from which the city afterwards suffered
was popularly attributed to the displeasure of the gods on this account.
In order to remove the curse the members of the family who were still
alive were banished, and the bones of those who had since died were dug up
and transported beyond the frontier. Epimenides, the diviner, was also
sent for from Crete, and under his direction new sanctuaries were
erected, and new rites of purification introduced.
There was now a
general feeling that means should be taken to put the civil and political
affairs of the country on a better footing. Fortunately a man appeared who
was eminently fitted to do the work of a reformer. Although belonging to an
illustrious house, Solon was at the same time possessed of broad sympathies
and democratic views, which he is supposed to have derived from his
experience as a traveller and his interest in commercial pursuits. His
patriotism was equal to his wisdom, and the first thing that won for him the
admiration and affection of his fellow-citizens was the fearless enthusiasm
with which he appealed to them to make a fresh attempt to regain Salamis from
the Megarians. The island had been so completely abandoned by the Athenians
that they had decreed the penalty of death against any one who should attempt
to rekindle the war, which had proved disastrous. The success
which attended Solon in this movement doubtless added to his reputation,
and disposed the citizens to give a favourable reception to
his legislative
[Illustration: THE AREOPAGUS AND THE
THESEUM
The craggy mass to the left is the Areopagus (Mars Hill), with
the cleft of the Eumenides. Behind the Temple of Theseus stretch the famous
olive groves of Athens, nourished by the water of the subterranean
Kephissus. The mountain range is that of Ægaleos, with the Pass of
Daphni.]
proposals. Among other changes which he introduced was the
abolition of a cruel law by which insolvent debtors were liable to be
enslaved along with their families; and in the political sphere he laid the
foundations of the democratic constitution which was destined to contribute
so largely to the greatness of Athens. He resisted all temptations to
take power into his own hands--to the surprise of some, who thought
he “should have hauled up the net when he had the fish enmeshed in
it.” Unfortunately his self-denying spirit was not shared by all
his countrymen, and he had the mortification of seeing his work to a
great extent frustrated by one of his own friends, Peisistratus by name,
whose success as a usurper was as much due to guile as to force. Posing as
a friend of the people he presented himself one day in the
market-place bleeding from self-inflicted wounds, which he pretended he had
received at the hands of his political enemies, whereupon one of his
partisans appealed for a bodyguard of fifty men to protect him, which was
granted. With their assistance he soon made himself master of the Acropolis,
and, by a stratagem, deprived the citizens of their arms. Although his
rule was comparatively mild, and was signalised by some useful
public enterprises, he was twice driven from the country. After his
second restoration he held his position for about fourteen years. On his
death his three sons carried on the government for some years, but at length
a plot was formed for their assassination by two young men, partly
on public and partly on private grounds. The plot was not
altogether successful, two of the despots being untouched. One of the
assassins, Harmodius, was at once overpowered and put to death, and the
other, Aristogeiton, also forfeited his life after being subjected to
torture in the hope that he would betray the names of their accomplices.
The dynasty became more unpopular than ever, owing to its
increasing severity, and in a few years the surviving members of it were
driven into exile. So highly was the conduct of the two tyrannicides,
Harmodius and Aristogeiton, appreciated that their statues in bronze were
erected in a prominent place between the Agora and the Acropolis, and for a
long time it was forbidden to erect any others in the same place. The
statues were carried off by Xerxes in the next century, but they were
soon replaced by others of a similar kind; and after the earlier ones
were recovered, the two groups stood side by side. Another monument of
the conspiracy was to be seen in the Acropolis in the form of a
tongueless lioness, representing a woman named _Leæna_, who had been
suspected of being in the plot, and was put to the torture, without divulging
any name.
Within a generation afterwards the Athenians’ love of
liberty and their readiness to die for it was demonstrated on a much grander
scale, in their resistance of the Persian invader. It is said that the first
time Darius heard of the Athenians was after the burning of Sardis, in
which they rendered assistance to the Asiatic Ionians. On their name
being mentioned to him Darius asked who they were, and, being told, he
shot an arrow to the sky, and exclaimed, “O Zeus, grant me to revenge
myself on these Athenians,” at the same time bidding an attendant to repeat
in his hearing every day at dinner the words, “Remember the Athenians.”
His generals, Datis and Artaphernes, now landed on the Attic shore
with about 100,000 men, under the guidance of Hippias, who had
accompanied his father Peisistratus by the same route to Athens nearly fifty
years before, when he was returning from exile the second time to
take possession of the city. But Athens was a very different community
now from what it was then. It had enjoyed more than twenty years
of self-government, and its citizens were now united as one man in
the determination to resist the eastern despot to the uttermost. Seldom
has a more heroic stand been taken by any nation in defence of
its liberties. The Persians had hitherto been regarded as invincible,
and their numerical superiority was overwhelming. But the Athenians did
not for a moment hesitate. They at once despatched a swift messenger
to Sparta appealing for assistance, who is said to have accomplished
the journey of 150 miles in forty-eight hours. But the Spartans were slow
to move, owing to their superstitious dependence on the full moon,
for which they had to wait five days. No other Greeks shared in the glory
of the occasion, except 1000 soldiers from Platæa, whose generous
and timely succour won the undying gratitude of the Athenians, and
was annually mentioned at the anniversary services which were
regularly held to celebrate the victory. Of the ten Athenian generals who
were in command of the forces it fell to Miltiades to act as chief. If
his advice had been taken by the Ionians who were left in charge of
the bridge which they had built over the Danube for Darius shortly
before, the invasion of Greece would have been averted. The sixty days
during which Darius had ordered them to preserve the bridge for his return
had expired, and Darius was beset with difficulties in Scythia, which
would soon have overwhelmed him; but the Ionian leaders refused to destroy
the bridge, as Miltiades advised--for the selfish reason that their
tenure of power in their respective cities depended on Persian support.
Darius was thus saved, and his cruel conquest of Eretria was the
result--the prelude, as it seemed, of a like fate for Athens and for all
Greece.
The distance from Athens to Marathon is about 25 miles, by the
road taken by the troops, which was the same as is followed by the
modern traveller. The length of the plain is about six miles and its breadth
a mile and a half, with a marsh at each end. The Persians had
disembarked and were drawn up in the plain at a considerable distance from
the shore. The Greeks appear to have taken up a position a little in
front of the amphitheatre of rocky hills which encloses the plain on the
north and west. It was the first time the Athenians had ever met the
dreaded Medes in battle array; but throwing aside all fear they raised
the war-cry and set off at a run, which was facilitated by the
slight declivity of the ground, bearing down upon
[Illustration: THE
BATTLE-FIELD OF MARATHON, FROM MOUNT PENTELIKON
The plain of Marathon and
the long spit of Kynosura are well shown; but the sickle shape of the famous
bay is obscured by the intervening summit of Mount Agrieliki. Across the blue
gulf of Petali we see the splendid chain of the Eubœan Mountains.]
the
enemy with such force as to compel them to give way at both wings, where
their ranks were weakest and those of the Greeks strongest. Instead of
pursuing the fugitives the victorious wings supported their own centre by
attacking the enemy from the flanks and rear, putting them into confusion and
causing a panic. The whole Persian host was soon in full flight to their
ships, but in their ignorance of the country many of them were caught in the
marshes and never reached the shore. According to Herodotus more than 6000 of
them lost their lives. Comparatively few prisoners were taken, as the
attempts of the Greeks to capture or burn the ships were attended with little
success; but rich spoils, in the form of tents and other equipments, fell
into their hands. As the fleet was sailing away towards Cape Sunium a
flashing shield was seen on a height above the plain, which was supposed to
be a traitorous signal given to the Persians to sail round to Athens and
take possession of the city in the absence of its defenders. Miltiades
was equal to the occasion. By dint of the most strenuous exertions he
and his troops reached Athens before the enemy could carry out his plan,
and the fleet soon set sail for the Cyclades. Next day the Athenians
went out again, to bury their dead comrades--192 in number--and erected
a tumulus over them, which may still be seen, along with a separate
mound for the Platæans, and one for the slaves who had served as unarmed
or half-armed attendants. Ten columns were afterwards set up, bearing
the names of the dead, according to their several tribes, with a
special monument to Miltiades; and Pausanias, who lived 600 years
later, mentions having read the names. It would scarcely be possible
to over-estimate the importance of the battle of Marathon in Greek
history. It virtually saved the country from being overrun by oriental
barbarism, and gave the world a signal proof for all time that the
military strength of a people depends more on their animating spirit than
on their numbers, and that it is possible for a comparatively small
nation to preserve its independence if its citizens be united and resolute
in devotion to the common cause. The event must have made an
enormous impression, when even such an illustrious poet as Æschylus regarded
it as the greatest honour of his life that he had fought at Marathon,
and left directions that that fact, and no other, should be recorded on
his tomb.
Ten years later the same peril reappeared in a still more
threatening form, and again the men of Athens covered themselves with glory.
It might have been expected that when Xerxes and his immense
host approached the city they would have prepared for a siege. But
the numbers of the enemy were so immense that, if they had remained
within the walls, it would only have been a question of time when they
would have had to surrender. In their distress they appealed to the
Delphian oracle for advice, but the first response was of a most
depressing nature. They were told to quit their “wheel-shaped city” and flee
to the ends of the earth. A second appeal, which they made in the form
of suppliants, elicited the assurance that when everything else in the
land of Cecrops was taken, Zeus would grant to Athena the preservation of
a wooden wall to be a sure defence to the Athenians and their
children. Under the astute guidance of Themistocles they came to the
conclusion that it was their ships that were referred to. A few of them,
however, mostly too old or too poor to have much prospect of a welcome
elsewhere, put a different construction on the oracle, and took refuge in
the Acropolis, strengthening its defences by the erection of
wooden palisades. They succeeded in holding the fortress for a time, in
spite of the arrows with burning tow attached which the Persians poured
in upon them from their position on the Areopagus. The assailants found
it impossible to force their way up against the great stones which
were rolled down upon them from the western entrance, and it was not
till they discovered a secret ascent on the north side of the rock that
they got the better of the defenders by taking them unawares, and
became masters of the fortress. A remorseless work of destruction then
ensued, involving the temples and other buildings on the Acropolis in the
same fate as had befallen, or was soon to befall, the best of the houses
in the city, and its walls. It seemed to the Athenians a terrible
calamity at the time, but it proved to be a blessing in disguise, for it led
to the restoration of the city on a scale of grandeur unknown before,
and made the Acropolis one of the wonders of the world. The
naval operations, also, to which they were obliged to have recourse,
crowned as these were by the glorious victory at Salamis, opened their eyes
to the possibility of a great naval empire, and led them to turn to
account the advantages to be derived from their harbours at the Piræus, by
not only equipping them with docks but also fortifying them and
connecting them with Athens by means of the long walls, completed in the
next generation by Pericles.
Most of the Athenians had taken refuge in
the adjoining island of Salamis (the ancient home of Ajax), partly owing to
an allusion to it in the second Delphian oracle. “Divine Salamis,” it was
said, “would destroy many sons of women”; and this, Themistocles held, could
only refer to a slaughter of the enemy. Although almost all the powers
in southern Greece were acting in concert with Athens in resisting
Xerxes, the Peloponnesians were disposed to fall back on their line of
defence at the isthmus of Corinth; and it was with the greatest difficulty
that Themistocles prevailed on them to take part in the engagement
at Salamis. When it seemed that nothing else would serve his purpose
he sent a secret message to Xerxes, as if he were turning traitor to
his country, urging him to prevent the escape of the Greeks when he had
them at his mercy. The ruse succeeded. During the night the
Persians stationed ships at the two ends of the straits to prevent the egress
of the Greeks, and also landed a body of men on the small island
of Psyttaleia, at the south-eastern outlet, in case the enemy
should
[Illustration: THE SEAWARD END OF THE PLAIN OF ATTICA LOOKING
TOWARDS SALAMIS
The view is bounded to the left by the foot of the
Acropolis, with part of Beule’s gate; below, to the right of this, we
overlook the whole of the ancient Assembly Place of the Athenian people (the
Pnyx), with its retaining wall of colossal masonry below, and its
scarped-rock boundary and _bēma_ above. Farther away the famous olive groves,
following the course of the Kephissus, stretch along the plain.]
seek
a refuge in what proved to be their own tomb. In the morning the two fleets
confronted each other, the Greek vessels lying under the crescent-shaped
coast of the island of Salamis, to the number of more than 300, while the
Persian ships, about three times as numerous, took up their position along
the Attic coast. Behind the latter their army was drawn up near the shore to
enjoy a sight of the expected victory, while Xerxes himself, for the same
purpose, occupied a rising ground, which is still known as Xerxes’ Seat,
sitting on a silver-footed throne, which was captured by the enemy and
afterwards exhibited on the Acropolis. On this occasion the courage was not
all on the part of the Greeks, for they were very cautious for a while, and
many of the Persians and their Phœnician and Ionic allies fought bravely.
But partly owing to the want of concert among the invaders, and
the unwieldiness of their immense fleet in the narrow waters, which soon
led to confusion, and partly to the superior naval skill of the Greeks,
the great king had the mortification of beholding the destruction of
about 200 of his ships of war and the capture or flight of many more,
while the Greeks escaped with the loss of forty ships. Xerxes was
so completely unmanned by the unexpected defeat, and so afraid that
the bridge over the Hellespont might be destroyed before he got across,
that he immediately took his departure. But in quitting Europe he sent
back his general Mardonius with 300,000 men to effect the conquest of
Greece. Attica was again ravaged, and the destruction of Athens was
rendered still more complete. Tempting overtures were made to the Athenians
by the Persian general for their submission, and great alarm was felt
in Sparta and elsewhere lest these overtures should be accepted. But
the Athenians did not for a moment entertain them. “Tell Mardonius,”
was their memorable answer, “that as long as the sun shall continue in
his present path, we will never contract alliance with Xerxes: we
will encounter him in our own defence, putting our trust in the aid of
those gods and heroes to whom he has shown no reverence, and whose houses
and statues he has burned.” Their faith was soon justified by the victory
of the allied forces at Platæa and the naval success which was achieved
the same day at Mycale. All fears of Persian conquest were dispelled;
and the Athenians returned from their temporary exile, to devote
themselves to the restoration of their city with a spirit and an energy
which betokened the great future in store for them.
Beyond Salamis,
about twenty miles south from Piræus, lies the island of Ægina, one of the
many interesting features in the view from the Acropolis. It was revered as
the ancient seat of Æacus, the grandfather of Achilles and Ajax, who was
accounted in his day to be the most pious of mankind. In historical times it
was inhabited chiefly by a Dorian colony from Epidaurus. Up to the time of
the Persian invasion Corinth was its only rival in Greece as a naval and
commercial centre; but it played an ignoble part in complying with Darius’
demands for earth and water when Athens and Sparta received the insulting
message with such indignation as to put the Persian envoys to death. On the
approach of Xerxes the Æginetans had endeavoured to redeem their character
by joining in the preparations for resistance; and in the battle of
Salamis they had taken such a distinguished part as to be awarded the
first prize for valour, the second prize going to the Athenians. On
that occasion two prizes were also given for the greatest skill and
wisdom; and it illustrates the self-esteem and love of honour of which
the Greeks seem to have had more than an ordinary share, that when the
votes were examined it was found that each of the leaders had put down his
own name for the first prize, and that of Themistocles for the
second!
Pericles described Ægina as the “eyesore of the Piræus,” and the
history of the relations between the two powers for many years after the
battle of Salamis, as well as for a few years before it, amply justifies
the observation. After many fierce struggles Ægina was reduced
to subjection, its fleets confiscated, and its fortifications destroyed.
On the outbreak of the Peloponnesian war the Athenians, in order to
guard against the possibility of the island being used by the enemy,
expelled its inhabitants, who found a refuge in Thyrea, which was placed at
their disposal by the Spartans. Even there, however, they were not left
in peace. For in the eighth year of the war the place was attacked
and captured by the Athenians, and the inhabitants were taken to
Athens, where they were put to death as prisoners of war. According
to Herodotus the sad reverses which thus befell the Æginetans were due
to an impiety of which they had been guilty many years before. The
solitary survivor of a band of conspirators had fled for refuge to the temple
of Demeter and succeeded in laying hold of the handle of the door before
he was overtaken. His pursuers did not dare to slay him while he was
thus in contact with the sanctuary, but in order to sever his connection
with it and deprive him of the protection of the goddess, they cut off
his arm at the wrist and then killed him, leaving the hand still
grasping the handle, where it long remained. With this we may compare the
conduct of the Spartans when Pausanias, the commander at Platæa, was called
to account for the treasonable designs into which, in his
overweening pride, he had entered with Persia. He took refuge in the temple
of Athena _Chalciœcus_, on learning that a confidential slave had betrayed
him. The ephors immediately built up the doors and took off the roof, keeping
watch over the refugee, and carrying him out at the last moment, that the
sacred precinct might not be polluted by his death. Both cases are curious
illustrations of the way in which men will try at times to evade their
religious obligations without giving up their form of godliness. The divine
anger in the case of the Spartans was only appeased by the dedication of two
bronze statues to Athena in obedience to the Delphian oracle.
On the
break-up of the Athenian empire, after the battle of Ægospotami, a remnant of
the former Dorian
[Illustration: THE TEMPLE OF ATHENA ON THE ISLAND OF
ÆGINA
The Temple, which is magnificently situated on the top of one of
the hills near Mount Elias, in the southern part of the island,
looks eastward towards Cape Colonna, over the blue waters of the Saronic
Gulf. The coast seen above the sea is part of the west coast of Attica
running down to Sunium. The drawing includes five out of the six columns of
the east front of the Temple, and five out of the twelve columns of
the north side, also two columns of the _pronaos_, together with
the architraves. These columns are of limestone, still partly covered
with their marble stucco.]
inhabitants of Ægina was brought back by
the Spartans, and the Athenian settlers were expelled. But in spite of the
occasional success of their naval strategy, by which they took the Piræus
once or twice completely by surprise, the Æginetans never recovered any
considerable degree of their former prosperity.
At the present day the
chief attraction which Ægina has to offer to the traveller, over and above
the pleasant sail from the Piræus, with its interesting points of view, is a
Doric temple of the sixth century or even earlier, standing in solitary
grandeur, on the summit of a hill which commands a beautiful view of the
plain of Attica on the north and the Argolic peninsula on the west. It was
once thought to be the temple of Zeus described by Pausanias, but latterly it
has been identified as the temple of Athena mentioned by Herodotus. Within
the last few years, however, a new theory has been put forth by Professor
Furtwangler, who holds it to be the temple of Aphæa mentioned by Pausanias, a
goddess nearly related to Artemis as a protector of women. In any case
the twenty columns still standing form an imposing monument, and are
well worthy of a visit, though the sculptures on the pediments are no
longer to be seen, having been purchased by the King of Bavaria and
deposited in the museum at Munich.
CHAPTER
IX
ATHENS AND ITS GODDESS
Among the influences which
contributed to the greatness and glory of Athens the worship of the goddess
Athena must be assigned a principal place. In her fully developed character
she represented the highest ideal of the Greek mind, and formed the noblest
figure in the Greek pantheon. She may be described as the impersonation of
wisdom, courage, and energy--equally powerful as the patron goddess of the
arts of peace and of the exploits of war. The mythical account of her birth,
which represented her as sprung from the head of Zeus after he had
swallowed her mother _Metis_ (“Counsel”), betokened her affinity with the
highest faculties of the supreme Ruler; and in harmony with this is the
etherial nature which was commonly ascribed to her by Homer and other
early writers. Her home was supposed to be in the upper regions, the
ether being regarded as her proper element. Hence the clearness and
brightness which were commonly attributed to her, as well as the keen,
rapid, energetic character by which she was also
distinguished.
[Illustration: VISTA OF THE NORTHERN PERISTYLE OF THE
PARTHENON, LOOKING WESTWARD
Out of the seventeen columns of the
northern peristyle the remains of fourteen, more or less perfect, may be
counted on the right. Six of them, which have stood unmoved for more than
twenty-two centuries, are distinguished by their splendid colour, almost
matching in this respect the second column of the west front, which is also
visible. The remains of the north _cella_ wall are seen to the left. The two
drums of columns in shadow in the foreground reflect the pure blue of the
early morning sky. Over their tops may be seen part of the Propylæa, and the
mountains of Daphni and Megara.]
Athena appears to have been
worshipped as a powerful and beneficent deity in many places, but it was at
Athens that the more intellectual aspects of her nature were brought into the
greatest prominence. How she came to be so closely associated with Athens as
to give her name to the city (previously known as “Cecropia”) is a question
that is not easily answered. According to the Attic mythology it was the
result of a contest between her and Poseidon for local supremacy. In support
of his claim Poseidon is said to have struck with his trident the rocky
summit of the Acropolis, the result being that a salt-water spring
appeared, from which there emerged a horse (supposed to be sacred to Poseidon
from its resemblance to a rushing wave); and this gift the lord of the
ocean set before the assembled jury of the gods as a token of the
benefits which he had to confer. Athena then caused an olive-tree to spring
up as the symbol of her beneficence, which secured from Zeus _Polieus_
a judgment in her favour. Perhaps the story may have had its origin in
the gradual retreat of the sea from the Attic plains; but there is
evidently a reference in it to the comparative value of land and water
interests, the former being represented by Athena, and the latter by
Poseidon. In their early days the Athenians had no idea of the importance of
the sea as the destined scene of their naval supremacy; and of all the
products of their country the olive was no doubt the most indispensable to
them. For its cultivation some knowledge was required, and perhaps also
the nature of its oil, with which the lamps were fed, may have helped
to make the olive an appropriate emblem of the brilliant goddess. The
whole history of Athens, from the rude beginnings of her civilisation till
the age of her imperial glory, may be seen reflected, after a
symbolic fashion, in the gradual transition of her worship from the wooden
image of Athena _Polias_, which was said to have fallen from heaven, to
the magnificent statue of gold and ivory which Pheidias made for
the Parthenon; and one of the most interesting studies in art is to be
found in tracing the successive stages through which the majestic
virgin-goddess was evolved. |
|
댓글 없음:
댓글 쓰기